Mail Archive Search: <+from:RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net>

Results:

References: [ +from:RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Jupiter & Pegasus CW note (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2001 20:38:43 -0800; Carl is correct. Not an uncommon problem. With my Omni VI+ and the Tentec psu on the left side of the radio I have a slight hum on the SSB audio. With the psu on the right side......no problem. 73 Bo; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00059.html (11,314 bytes)
42. [TenTec] OMNI VI Receive Audio Mod. (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 07:23:13 -0800; Here's another. I'm very confortable with the Omni VI+ audio performance. I do intend to look into the audio chain to see what it's doing and objectively if it can or should be improved. I think many; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00066.html (9,846 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Scout Question (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 08:51:15 -0800; Hey folks.... Someone has already said it could be a temperature problem. Well, look at the duty cycle for high speed CW as compared to lower speed CW. Simple.....increased duty cycle equals more hea; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00082.html (14,674 bytes)
44. [TenTec] RF in audio (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 19:59:43 -0800; I too am on my 3rd Tentec rig. I started in 1980 with a Delta 580, latter a Pargaon and now an Omni VI+. Now my station is in the center section on the 2nd floor of a 2 story wood frame house so "gro; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00121.html (10,660 bytes)
45. [TenTec] When Is Ground Really Ground? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 21:36:19 -0800; In response to several inquiries, here's my thoughts on ground. There's 3 basic types of radio system grounds. (a) DC ground: Best described as a conductor running from the radio to a driven ground r; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00123.html (9,329 bytes)
46. [TenTec] [TENTEC] WTB OMNI6+ (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:09:13 -0800; Well, before I got my Omni VI+ I had some questions regarding product quality. My questions were raised based on a problem or two a fellow ham had with his new Omni VI+. I put my old trusty Paragon i; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00191.html (8,754 bytes)
47. [TenTec] OMNI VI @ qrp level ? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:12:02 -0800; Just checked my Omni VI+. When in TUNE I can control the output from 0.25 watt to just over 100 watts with the PWR control. When in CW mode the exact same thing happens, 0.25 to 100. I don't see the; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00231.html (8,144 bytes)
48. [TenTec] On Inrad filters (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 22:34:19 -0800; Gee, I put the 1.8KHz, 500Hz, 250Hz in the 6.3MHz IF and the 1.8KHz and 500Hz in the 9.0MHz IF in my Omni VI+ with no problems at all. They work great on CW too. No hackin' slashin' beatin' or bangin; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00254.html (8,231 bytes)
49. [TenTec] ground (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:55:20 -0800; I've said it before and I'll say it again. Please bond the AC line ground and the station ground rod together with #6 AWG copper. The current NEC (National Electrical Code) requires that all antenna; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-03/msg00261.html (11,040 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Triton IV audio (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:00:32 -0800; I don't think that Tentec uses a LOG taper pot for the RX audio. If they did I don't think the volume would reach loud porportions in the first 90 degrees of rotation. At least that's the way my Omni; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00015.html (9,469 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Computer RFI (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 17:59:11 -0800; Interesting. I run an old ACER 486DX66 with Windows 3.1. The computer tower, keyboard, 15" NEC Multisync monitor, Microtec flatbed scanner, and HP 820Cxi printer sit on the same table along with the; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00132.html (9,672 bytes)
52. FW: [TenTec] RE: Jupiter pros and cons (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:44:25 -0800; While I agree, RF in the shack can cause a rig to go nuts thus do un-predicted things, I've allways thought that the true solution was to "fix the RF in the shack" problem rather than make the statio; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-02/msg00187.html (11,973 bytes)
53. [TenTec] New Radio and the XYL (LONG) (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 09:43:46 -0800; Well, quite frankly regarding money, I have the last word at our house. YES, DEAR, WHAT EVER YOU WANT. With this answer she never questions what radio gear I buy. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://w; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00075.html (7,850 bytes)
54. [TenTec] re: Reciever comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 09:58:35 -0800; Jim, Ken and all; In looking at the comparison chart, it's clear the K2 appears better. After all it's their chart. When I was with an electronics design and manufacturing company, our product always; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00076.html (10,120 bytes)
55. [TenTec] re: Receiver comparison chart on website (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:38:39 -0800; While the K2 looks attractive in many ways, has anyone built a kit of this complexity lately? And made it work? If I recall, this is a 12 watt TX radio too. Wonder how that would fair in a pile-up on; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00083.html (11,530 bytes)
56. [TenTec] rec comparisons.. " least expensive reference" (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 12:47:39 -0800; Bill: You hit the nail on the head! I built a Heath SB-104A and made it work. I had about 60 hrs invested in it. Factoring in my time at modest labor rates, it was damn expensive radio. Well over $30; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00085.html (9,514 bytes)
57. [TenTec] Paragon Manual For Sale (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 09:56:12 -0800; I have my original manual for Model 585 Paragon. No longer needed as I traded to a Omni VI+. Manual is in good condition except for my notes of S/N, purchase date, etc written on top of first page (c; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00120.html (6,717 bytes)
58. [TenTec] QUESTION "OMNI" (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2001 18:13:24 -0800; My experience with the built-in tuner in a couple of different radios concluded that the range the tuner will handle is very limited. I've found that an external tuner works better. I run high power; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00136.html (8,413 bytes)
59. [TenTec] More CW-Only Rig (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 15:31:27 -0800; In reading through the postings and discussions and being an Omni VI+ owner, it seems to me that the readers have not disclosed the true hidden requirements. I project that the needs are a $500 CW on; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00145.html (11,557 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Lineage of Transceivers ? (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@InfoAve.Net (Bob & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 22:27:56 -0800; Having bought a Delta 580, I seem to recall that it was introduced at Dayton in 1979. I bought mine in 1980. 73 Bob K4TAX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@conte; /archives//html/TenTec/2001-01/msg00162.html (12,014 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]