Mail Archive Search: <+from:Kc9cdt@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Kc9cdt@aol.com: 561 ]

Total 561 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Open Source for TT firmware (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:20:45 EST; One thing you forgot. Just because TT has gone to EOL on the Peg., Thats marketing! EOL! THEY WILL STILL SERVICE IT! So, no way they would want different non-TT versions coming in for repair? Makes s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00678.html (6,636 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec is not being sold. (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:35:31 EST; Scott, Wow, I agree no MFJ for me. Have Orion and will have Centurion soon! Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/m; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00019.html (6,905 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Doug Smith to Collins Rockwell (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 16:40:55 EST; Whos' going to fix / add features / impove the Orion now? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00261.html (6,586 bytes)
44. [TenTec] WTB Centaur in Excellant condition (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:17:47 EST; Hi everyone, I am looking for a Centaur in excellant condition. Any out there surplus to your needs? Thanks, Lee, KC9CDT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00283.html (6,910 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] RX/TX Broken in Orion Version 1.369? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:32:26 EST; What do you mean by RX/TX is broken? Thanks, Lee, KC9CDT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00334.html (7,750 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Decision??? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:59:33 EST; John, You also have a third option. Get a good used Ten-Tec Centaur. 600 Watts out FULL QUIET QSK AND COMPLETELY COMPATABLE WITH THE ORION. About the same cost as a new Ameritron 811H and better buil; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00423.html (7,507 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Decision??? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:59:37 EST; Well there is always lots of ways to look at things. It really depends on your specific situation. I live in an area that prohibits big antennas. No towers, hence no beams. No antennas that are not h; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00439.html (8,490 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:34:08 EST; Well, This may be a result of not having a standard, regression test list and full formal procedure for testing firmware after many program changes before releasing it. I have seen times when custome; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00520.html (7,497 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] v1369 ?? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:37:14 EST; Looks like we are continuing to see issues because the CPU is to slow. It looks like to me we may need a faster CPU in the Orion. It may just not be enough power to do the job intended. Not using fea; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00528.html (7,429 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] v1369 and Sweep (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:12:37 EST; I think the sweep is very usefull. Right now I am on a DX net on 15 mtrs, occationally I may see a signal a few KC's away. I go to investigate it wth RX # 2. If it's somrthing I need I can just push; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00538.html (7,537 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Orion Check List (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:11:21 EST; Richard, I work mostly 20-10, here is what works for me. Simple my friend! RF Gain 100, AGC to Prog - with Hang .3, Decay 10, Threshold anywhere from about 9.57 to 63.83 BASED ON BAND NOISE and Condi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00592.html (6,835 bytes)
52. Re: [TenTec] Lock the 2.4 KHz Roofing Filter? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:29:59 EST; Bernard, Oh Yes, definetely set the filter to 2.4. Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00642.html (7,066 bytes)
53. Re: [TenTec] FS: Filters 216 & 288 (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 20:16:34 EST; I'm pretty sure you can use the 216 with Orion?? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00409.html (6,656 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Difference between 238 and 238A tuners (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 19:10:43 EST; I thought the 238B was the black one? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00446.html (7,361 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:22:31 EST; BUT, Read the web masters post, not free forever??? Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00478.html (7,383 bytes)
56. Re: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 16:37:08 EST; It was not a question, just a comment that yep it's free again for now, but who knows for how long. Personally I will contribute the $15 /yr. I think it's worth it. 73, Lee __________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00487.html (7,765 bytes)
57. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:37:06 EST; Martin, Same for me, no direct response, usually ( I did get one many monthes ago) I hope they are hitting it hard, as sure looks like they have a basket full of issues to fix. I am on 1.366, it work; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00539.html (7,423 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Raspy Receive CW Note Problem Solved (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:17:09 EST; Hey guys, I am still running 1.366. I have had no failures at all. Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00590.html (6,991 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] BPL Update (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:17:33 EST; The decision makers at FCC are obviously ignoring all these facts about how poor BPL is. Could only be one reason for that $$$$$$$. So, if I eventually get BPL in my area, it causes me interference,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00711.html (7,604 bytes)
60. Re: [TenTec] BPL Update (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:09:30 EST; Has there been reported outages to BPL subscribers from Hams in Manassas as well? Hope so. Lee _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.c; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00736.html (7,483 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]