Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Orion and MIKEs (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 13:32:44 EST
One step further, looking at the diagrams in the new manual I get little confused: Wonder if it is the cause of some audio problems reported earlier. Page 9 shows Figure 2-3 Front view, mic connector
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00162.html (8,202 bytes)

42. Re: VS: [TenTec] Orion and MIKEs (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 05:53:47 EST
even you had mic in metal or semiconductor box ? Did I understand wrong? I am still quite sure, that only rig end grounding is best way.<< What I was questioning in discrepancy between the two drawin
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00174.html (6,755 bytes)

43. Re: VS: [TenTec] Orion and MIKEs (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 08:12:49 EST
the schematic PDF files, but could not find microphone file. I gave up since there are 43 of PDF files.<< Mike connector schematic is on A8/81913.pdf There is dot missing that is obvious, no connecti
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00176.html (7,160 bytes)

44. [TenTec] Orion, service manual, knobs (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 19:58:46 EST
After trying to trace PTT and mike circuits in Orion schematics, I had to give up. I am having hard time to follow signals from page to page through cables and connectors. Maybe I was out of it for a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00236.html (7,400 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec]software defined radio, was "audio" (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 20:05:55 EST
On the "software radio" I can see problems already with the PTT thing. If the hardware is not capable of accommodating change, then there is a bigger problem. Suppose you make some mods in hardware,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00238.html (8,970 bytes)

46. Re: [TenTec]software defined radio, was "audio" (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 20:50:08 EST
own an Orion. What's up Yuri ?<< Sorry, I clicked on your post as reply, but your was reply to who wrote the portion I atributed by mistake to you: Yuri ______________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00242.html (7,814 bytes)

47. [TenTec] Re: Software defined surprises (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 21:34:21 EST
the mike connector. Both the internal keyer and pin 3 (black jack) of the AUX connector key the TX. As will the key line if that is enabled on SSB. << Just the opposite, I don't want to key with PTT
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00243.html (8,047 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Problem w/Omni VI and INRAD filter (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:20:16 EST
makes R3 and R4 nulling adjustments critical. << OmniVI is BFO (and passband setting) is drifting, make sure that the alignments is done after rig is warmed up and stabilized. For overall rig tempera
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00580.html (7,760 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Bavarian Contest Club / Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:48:05 EST
there needs to be a comparison of all the top line radios at once, ie:Orion, IC-7800, 756proII, FT1000MP, TS-870 etc. as this will be a more apples to apples comparison. However, I do have a feeling
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00755.html (7,947 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Bavarian Contest Club / Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:52:13 EST
antenna My opine on that subject is that it is NOT indicative in any way of receiver noise. Rather, it's an artifact of the AGC loop in DSP and the behavior of the system trying to find "something" i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00762.html (8,640 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Bavarian Contest Club / Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 09:52:36 EST
those a long time ago, and my view of their validity has not changed -- particularly in light of what all of us have learned about optimizing weak signal performance in the Orion since that fiasco. G
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00768.html (8,723 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Waiting for Transceiver Nirvana (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:11:33 EST
fling. I may opt out.<< If you don't have money but time, you make decent contest radio from old radios with some modifications (been there done), you can get Elecraft K2, build it, cheap, best value
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00770.html (7,531 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] Re Orion on Elecraft's Receiver Summary Page (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:10:22 EST
if I know how to read diags :-) << They were trained to ask your name, address and ask if you want to buy a cell phone. I always told them my name is Johnny Cash (may he RIP, one of our famous hams)
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00118.html (7,768 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:20:25 EST
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU What headphones did you use? :-) Yuri _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/te
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00629.html (7,598 bytes)

55. [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:59:14 EST
Howdy rig warriors! I have been QRL, but reading some of the arguments about equipment testing, evaluation, comparisons. ARRL is doing decent job with reviews, tests, but still looking at things thro
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00631.html (9,130 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:54:19 EST
advertising magazine, with a well equipped lab, staffed by enthusiastic contesters and DXers, to do rig tests the way rig tests should be done. << OK, lets start here, this is the most evangelical gr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00648.html (10,338 bytes)

57. Re: [TenTec] Equipment reviews. (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:11:29 EST
test equipment calibrated to NIST standards at the beginning of each test, would satisfy the technically oriented part of our community.<< I am not going to argue about difference of 0.001 of dB betw
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00673.html (7,873 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Roofing filters (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 23:48:27 EST
does it get its name? How does it differ from the standard filters with which I am familiar?<< It doesn't, "roofing" name is more associated with how the filter is used. Most of "general coverage" ri
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00952.html (8,055 bytes)

59. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:55:49 EST
something that I overlooked when I first read the Orion review and that I haven't seen mentioned. The Orion seemed to exhibit cw element shortening, which I only noticed when looking at the fuller K2
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00969.html (7,202 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 19:40:37 EST
operational on CW?<< "Yes" but it becomes KEYING line instead of PTT on CW, so you lose PTT function, but you could send code with your foot switch, which none of the above $3k rigs allows :-) Appare
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00988.html (8,183 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu