Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+WcF\s+section\s+in\s+ARRL\s+160\s+test\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+WcF\s+section\s+in\s+ARRL\s+160\s+test\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] WcF section in ARRL 160 test (score: 1): Author: feutz@wctc.net (Ron Feutz); Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 10:49:36 -0600; Two stations gave me WcF for section in the 160 test. I see it in the Arrlsec.dom file, but neither it nor WC is in my multiplier list on the screen (V. 6.45). Is WcF a valid section for the 160? If; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-12/msg00175.html (6,679 bytes)
2. [TRLog] WcF section in ARRL 160 test (score: 1): Author: feutz@wctc.net (Ron Feutz); Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:14:49 -0600; Two stations gave me WcF for section in the 160 test. I see it in the Arrlsec.dom file, but neither it nor WC is in my multiplier list on the screen (V. 6.45). Is WcF a valid section for the 160? If; /archives//html/TRLog/2000-12/msg00176.html (6,767 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]