Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Re\:\s+Time\s+display\s+for\s+TR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Re\:\s+Time\s+display\s+for\s+TR\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 09:56:46 -0800 (PST); Windows NT in DOS mode? This probably has to do with NT not letting TR run 100% of the time. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrati; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00076.html (7,675 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 14:01:35 -0800 (PST); Well - the time stuff is probably screwed up for the same reason the CW sounds funny under NT. Perhaps there are some settings that can be adjusted to give TR more time slices. However, figuring tha; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00082.html (8,027 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: Fatchett.Mike@tci.com (Fatchett, Mike); Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:07:45 -0700; Well - the time stuff is probably screwed up for the same reason the CW sounds funny under NT. Perhaps there are some settings that can be adjusted to give TR more time slices. However, figuring tha; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00084.html (8,395 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: kk7gw@yahoo.com (David Jones); Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 02:43:29 +0000 (GMT); What I've found, running W95, is that when I have TR in a DOS window, the time is fine, even if TR is in the background. Of course, I can't send CW from a window. So, during a CW contest I'll boot s; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00090.html (8,669 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: dickscott-tampa@worldnet.att.net (Dick Scott); Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 23:48:50 -0500; Thanks Tree. Maybe some NT Guru out there might have an answer. If not, I may have to switch computers before the next contest and run 95. Yuck! Well - the time stuff is probably screwed up for the s; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00091.html (9,249 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: kk7a@micron.net (Jim - KK7A); Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 22:42:33 -0700; Let me put a bug in the ear of a hardware designer / programmer. This has been an idea of mine for quite some time, but due to other priorities it probably won't come to pass from me. It would addres; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00092.html (11,332 bytes)
7. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:13:00 +0000; I may be missing something -- like a Windows program that Dick wants to run along with TRLog -- but I have booted the NT Server at work in DOS from a floppy when I needed to do something that NT does; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00104.html (8,584 bytes)
8. [TRLog] Re: Time display for TR (score: 1): Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ronald D Rossi); Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 17:07:02 -0500; Folks, I discovered that the power management features are what cause the time errors on my 586 machine. In my case the system was actually not able to cope. The BIOS design may have been energy star; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-12/msg00111.html (8,779 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]