Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Re\:\s+Converting\s+TRLog\s+to\s+Windows\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Re\:\s+Converting\s+TRLog\s+to\s+Windows\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Re: Converting TRLog to Windows (score: 1): Author: w2cs@ipass.net (Gary J. Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 08:52:00 -0500; As easy as a "port" of the code? No, it's not, I agree wholeheartedly. It's a redo of an excellent DOS program onto a different technology base. But, this "timing" bugaboo I've heard enough of over t; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00043.html (12,131 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Re: Converting TRLog to Windows (score: 1): Author: charlieo@tellabs.com (charlieo@tellabs.com); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 13:33:19 -0600 (CST); I dunno about you, but I can't imagine cw contesting with a mouse!!! I'll keep my keyboard, thank you. Vy 73, Charlie N9CO -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@co; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00054.html (7,630 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Re: Converting TRLog to Windows (score: 1): Author: w2cs@ipass.net (Gary J. Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 22:37:53 -0500; I guess I'm prone to fits of imagination-hi!! Certainly for data entry one uses the keyboard (although pointing and clicking to get to a call/freq on the remembered list of same would be a good use; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00068.html (9,632 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Re: Converting TRLog to Windows (score: 1): Author: paule@sfu.ca (Paul Erickson); Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 20:06:42 -0800 (PST); Hi Charlie, Right you are. I tried using writelog (window program) and trying to use the mouse while trying to do cw was a real pain. It is similar to some of the problems introduced with the new wor; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00069.html (8,649 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Re: Converting TRLog to Windows (score: 1): Author: gbaron@home.com (Gil Baron W0MN); Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 05:41:38 -0600; I think this needs to be put to bed quickly. I don't know of any well written application that will not let you use keystrokes instead of the mouse. If you could do it with a keystroke before, you st; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00074.html (10,246 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Re: Converting TRLog to Windows (score: 1): Author: paule@sfu.ca (Paul Erickson); Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 07:09:30 -0800 (PST); Hi Gil, I am not disputing that, but was reflecting the realities of the one currently available "windows" program "WriteLog" which suffers from the problems I mentioned. cheers, Paul VE7CQK/email: p; /archives//html/TRLog/1999-11/msg00079.html (10,864 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]