- 1. [TRLog] Radio Update Seconds (score: 1)
- Author: 00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu (00tlzivney@bsuvc.bsu.edu)
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:27:40 -0500 (EST)
- OK, I guess you win. CT seems totally unable to realiably do all the 2 radio stuff and NA on my 486-66 operates at glacial speed. I downloaded the demo of TR today, and it seems to do all I need: rea
- /archives//html/TRLog/2000-06/msg00064.html (8,032 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] Radio Update Seconds (score: 1)
- Author: geoiii@kkn.net (George Fremin III - K5TR)
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 19:08:56 -0700
- I am not sure I understand but I have never had any problem switching between the two radios very quickly and I have been making alot of band changes/second radio QSOs. Is there any way to provide fa
- /archives//html/TRLog/2000-06/msg00065.html (7,860 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] Radio Update Seconds (score: 1)
- Author: Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@dialup.mplik.ru (Igor Sokolov)
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:08:26 +0600
- What are the radios that you use? There are ajustable delays build into the program for different radio. I for one use Icom and the Icom Command Pause and Icom Responce Timeout sums up to nearly 1 se
- /archives//html/TRLog/2000-06/msg00069.html (9,604 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] Radio Update Seconds (score: 1)
- Author: roberto.soro@sia.it (Soro Roberto)
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 14:55:21 +0200
- Hi all, there is a parameter that can be adjusted, for radio one and radio two, but per "1" seconds step!! Since the default is 1 second already, you can only make this time longer!! These are: RADIO
- /archives//html/TRLog/2000-06/msg00070.html (10,686 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu