- 1. [TRLog] More Icom Radio Delay (score: 1)
- Author: kl7ra@blizzard.gcgo.nasa.gov (KL7RA)
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 07:17:08 -0800
- Hi Mike I ran some tests with TR and a 781 this morning after our private e-mails on this subject, and you are correct. For a test I loaded the bandmap with a call every 1 KHz for 5 KHz. Then tuning
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-05/msg00001.html (8,187 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] More Icom Radio Delay (score: 1)
- Author: w9re@worldnet.att.net (Mike Wetzel)
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:50:26 -0500
- Rich-thanks for the confirmation as several others have not seen the problem! For a little more info on this-I just ran a test using Writelog, and it falls in between CT and TR as far as response. I
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-05/msg00002.html (9,922 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] More Icom Radio Delay (score: 1)
- Author: vr2bg@harts.org.hk (VR2BrettGraham)
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 02:18:51 +0000
- It has been so long since I used Brand-C with an ICOM - does it allow you to set the "transceive" switch on interface module? If so, then radio will automatically output data on where it is after the
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-05/msg00005.html (7,739 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] More Icom Radio Delay (score: 1)
- Author: w9re@worldnet.att.net (Mike Wetzel)
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:00:38 -0500
- I see my that I did not communicate my problem clearly! People are talking about tuning the radio then typing a call and hitting the space bar which with the 1 second delay is workable. What I was us
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-04/msg00133.html (6,799 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu