Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Interesting\s+CW\s+Technique\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Interesting\s+CW\s+Technique\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: kk7a@micron.net (Jim - KK7A); Date: Thu, 11 Dec 1997 23:13:50 -0700; During the 160 test this last weekend, there was one individual who did something that was truely amazing to me. It is probably more common that I think but the first time I've really noticed it. He; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00056.html (8,967 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:31:44 -0600; hour before TR would start to increase the speed toward the maximum. speed manually. I don't think this is a silly idea at all. I use this technique sometimes, and it sounds like a good idea, but how; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00057.html (8,902 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: jalarson@micron.com (jalarson); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 11:01:04 -0700; What about this? Don't worry about a threshold at all. Here is a senario: Call CQ, get answer, make QSO and then QRZ. Response to QRZ? If yes, then increment speed. If no response to QRZ, then you go; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00058.html (9,645 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: n9ssg@pobox.com (David Yanke); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 12:08:06 -0500; Gather 'round and here what Mark Beckwith had to say at 10:31 on 12 Dec 97 I don't know if it's in there or if it does or doesn't do it, but I don't want something like this hanging over your head an; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00059.html (8,699 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: ku7y@sage.dri.edu (Monte Stark); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:33:17 -0800 (PST); An interesting idea has been posted.... How about making the CW speed step size usuer adjustable? This would let the pge-up/pge-dn take whatever step you wanted? I think it's done by percentage. So i; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00060.html (8,376 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 13:21:27 -0600; Specifying it in WPM would be fine with me. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00061.html (8,339 bytes)
7. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: v31ry@ix.netcom.com (AE0Q V31RY); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 05:22:41 -0700; I'd like to have that, too. Sometimes the 3 wpm jumps are just a little more than needed (the 2 wpm steps of CT seemed about right).. 73 -- Glenn -- "Remember, any tool can be the right tool!" Red Gr; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00063.html (8,583 bytes)
8. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: w7zrc@micron.net (Rod Greene); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 06:53:09 -0700; I think we are on to a good idea here. I like the page-up and down at 3 wpm but there are times when a smaller increment would suit my needs better. However, I don't want to jump to set another param; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00064.html (8,631 bytes)
9. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 17:07:35 -0800 (PST); You guys are serious about this... I am not sure shift-page-up or shift-page-down are the best choices, since pressing the shift key activates the QSY or RIT functions for some people. Probably the; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00065.html (9,476 bytes)
10. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 17:04:35 -0600; If this were available I would certainly like to play with it. It would want to retain the upper and lower limits, though (gosh, or maybe not). It could be called the "intelligent speed" feature. MAr; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00068.html (8,678 bytes)
11. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:52:22 -0600; Now I think that is too many keys! We all differ so...! Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@con; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00111.html (8,134 bytes)
12. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:54:48 -0600; Brilliant as usual, Herr Director. Thanks Tree. Mark, N5OT P.S. Does that say SPPED?? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00112.html (8,191 bytes)
13. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: kk7a@micron.net (Jim - KK7A); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 20:49:18 -0700; Just thought I would pass along a piece of mail from a person who shall remain anonymous. It made me laugh so hard I almost fell out of my chair! Here it is: -- Let's say that you are calling CQ and; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00113.html (8,337 bytes)
14. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: no6x@inreach.com (Mike); Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 04:54:15 +0000; Sounds like when I worked VK0IR on 40 CW was so excited could not send 5nn to save my butt!! Mike...NO6X Check out my home page at http://home.inreach.com/no6x -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.c; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00114.html (8,916 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]