Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Hand\s+vs\s+Computer\s+\-\s+Some\s+analisys\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Hand\s+vs\s+Computer\s+\-\s+Some\s+analisys\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Hand vs Computer - Some analisys (score: 1): Author: Vic_Goncharsky@p180.f10.n462.z2.fido.ccrd1.lviv.ua (Vic_Goncharsky); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 97 07:37:48 +0300; Dear fellow contesters! After reading most of the recent discussion regarding the paper vs computer logging I did not find any messagees containing serious attempts to analyze this dilemma that we ar; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00121.html (14,095 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Hand vs Computer - Some analisys (score: 1): Author: lu6beg@canopus.com.ar (Ernesto Grueneberg); Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 14:45:45 -0300; omputer scores "SOMETHING ELSE" starting in last counterparts percent It doesn't matter. That increase is useful when you're copying high quantity of text, but to copy 6 or 8 letters I can't see any; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00127.html (16,579 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]