Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+CQ\s+reports\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+CQ\s+reports\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] CQ reports (score: 1): Author: jfunk@adams.net (jim funk); Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 16:59:57 -0600 (CST); Does CQ still require an accumulated total of Q's, points and mults at the bottom of each page, for logs submitted electronically? This usually takes me about 10% as much time as actually operating t; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-03/msg00004.html (6,670 bytes)
2. [TRLog] CQ reports (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Tree N6TR); Date: Mon, 2 Mar 1998 16:34:11 -0800 (PST); There is a function in POST to do this. However, I know the guy who wrote the software CQ uses to check logs and he says there isn't any need to do this. Their software seems to handle the LOG.DAT f; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-03/msg00005.html (6,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]