- 1. [TRLog] ASCII vs. BINary (score: 1)
- Author: k6xx@jps.net (Bob Wolbert)
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 11:34:51 -0700
- Gentlemen, I have used TR for a couple of years, and CT for many more (previously). This is not meant as a rude complaint, but the lack of user friendliness when correcting entry mistakes is a real s
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00050.html (7,856 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] ASCII vs. BINary (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Larry Tyree)
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:14:13 -0700 (PDT)
- Okay - I am a little confused here... Over the years, there have been improvements to the error correcting methods in TR. We have done away with the question asking if you want to make the changes t
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00051.html (9,164 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] ASCII vs. BINary (score: 1)
- Author: n6tr@teleport.com (Larry Tyree)
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 16:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
- If you select the mode that only lets you have access to your QSOs (so you don't see the other band's QSOs), you can edit your last 5 QSOs, and since they don't get passed around the network until t
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00054.html (7,337 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] ASCII vs. BINary (score: 1)
- Author: ai7b@teleport.com (Bob Wruble)
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 21:51:36 -0700
- I think all the talk abt editing is BS anyway.....use the SW and u will see with a lil practice that its not a problem to edit either via the last 5 qso scroll method or drop a note into cntrl N and
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00060.html (10,486 bytes)
- 5. [TRLog] ASCII vs. BINary (score: 1)
- Author: n9br@mc.net (BillR)
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 11:22:49 -0000
- Bob, The bottom line is TR would be a BETTER program if you could edit any QSO in the log, last 5, last 100 I don't care. A logging program should not prohibite you from editing the log. When I reali
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-07/msg00061.html (11,892 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu