- 1. [TRLog] 6 band change rule (score: 1)
- Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR)
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:02:11 -0800
- I think the first sentence answers the question asked in the second sentence better than I can. While I haven't tried to put a specific feature in to deal with the 10 minute rule, I did try doing off
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00022.html (8,061 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] 6 band change rule (score: 1)
- Author: n2ic@arrl.net (Steve London)
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 19:09:17 +0000
- What's going on here ? There is a 6 band change/hour rule for M/S in ARRL DX. No need to keep track of any 10 minute clock. TR already handles the 6 band change/hour rule just fine by setting the HOU
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00029.html (9,445 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] 6 band change rule (score: 1)
- Author: tavan@tibco.com (Rick Tavan)
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:34:29 -0800
- Requiring K5NZ to enter M/M because of a couple of band-change mistakes is ridiculous. Disqualify the Q's made during the illegal band change from NZ's log and count them as valid in the other statio
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00032.html (9,283 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] 6 band change rule (score: 1)
- Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV)
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 19:25:40 -0500
- Exactly. The hour is defined as n:00 through and including n:59. Six changes in that period. NOTHING to do with the clock, other than the definition of the hour. You can go 50 minutes on a run on twe
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00033.html (10,317 bytes)
- 5. [TRLog] 6 band change rule (score: 1)
- Author: juhan@chem.ut.ee (Juhan Põldvere)
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 21:32:31 +0200
- Hmm. We are talking Multi/2 here. -- 20CW 06-Mar-02 20:46 61A K3XZH 599 599 ... 40CW 06-Mar-02 20:46 115B I2PMX 599 599 ... 20CW 06-Mar-02 20:47 62A JG1ZUY 599 599 ... 40CW 06-Mar-02 20:47 116B EA1E
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-03/msg00052.html (7,571 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu