- 1. [TRLog] Arghh. Halp. Need something entirely new from TR. (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2002 17:44:42 -0500
- Guy's suggestion for improving the bandmap sound very solid from a practical standpoint, but certainly adds fuel to the "assisted" debate. I would think this sort of thing could be identified by sop
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-06/msg00008.html (8,414 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] Wrong Date (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 09:41:30 -0500
- I would use a text editor that has a "find and replace" tool and find all the wring things and change them to the right things. I would probably use Word Perfect myself. Mark, N5OT day
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-06/msg00035.html (7,382 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] code speed (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 06:24:41 -0600
- This is a quote off the cq-contest reflector which echoes something I have asked about in the past. I still like the idea. Possible? Easy? Hard? "Maybe contest software should have a RUFZ-like featur
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00008.html (7,545 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:20:38 -0600
- Both went on to talk about their operating techniques. This was not my intent. I am sure we all have our things we like and things we don't like. What may be important to me may not be important to y
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00012.html (8,596 bytes)
- 5. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 15:22:19 -0600
- This is one of those days when I wonder if we are speaking the same language. My questions are: Tree: Is it easy or hard to make this change? Everyone else: Is this of any value to you? The question
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00015.html (10,342 bytes)
- 6. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:42:07 -0600
- I am the first to agree with this - if it is not an easy change! Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00023.html (8,850 bytes)
- 7. [TRLog] CODE SPEED CHANGES (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:49:19 -0600
- Gosh. I was trying to figure out the best way to say this without coming off really looney. I guess you said it, Tree. Like I said, if it's easy then great. If it is not, I agree with Pete and every
- /archives//html/TRLog/2002-01/msg00025.html (8,870 bytes)
- 8. [TRLog] Newbie Questions (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:27:32 -0600
- My callsign and exchange fields do not change color when I change from CQ mode to S&P mode. I also have completely customized every color on the screen, so maybe somewhere in that process I made ever
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00105.html (8,942 bytes)
- 9. [TRLog] non-INSERT mode (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 13:49:46 -0600
- For many years I have had trouble with the pesky "improper syntax" notice coming up when the call is perfect in the call window. Still happens to this very day. I back all the way out and redo the QS
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00108.html (6,503 bytes)
- 10. [TRLog] Handling of "?" at end of call sign (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 08:28:35 -0600
- Not only did I follow it, but I agree completely. This would be a great thing. If you got the call right but weren't sure, and you added a ? because you wanted him to know you weren't sure, and he se
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00132.html (7,938 bytes)
- 11. [TRLog] spotting QSOs (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 07:44:52 -0600
- Someone posted this on the cq-contest reflector: This TRlog sure is a great program. I resisted giving away to competitors the fact that when I view my TRlog I can always spot which QSOs are S&P just
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00147.html (7,139 bytes)
- 12. [TRLog] spotting QSOs (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 08:14:23 -0600
- Um, Ken, I know I look pretty dumb, but I was making a joke which subtly made fun of packet users, pretending to be so pure as to not even know enough about packet as to understand the intended use o
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00149.html (7,419 bytes)
- 13. [TRLog] Stupid question (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 09:36:39 -0600
- Hi you all. Sorry for asking a stupid question which I am sure has already been answered here before, but I haven't been paying close enough attention. When I use TRlog, the CW is distorted in the fi
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00003.html (7,361 bytes)
- 14. [TRLog] Stupid question (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:59:28 -0600
- I did notice that the bad code (no offense Tree!) appeared to be happening during disk writes. I will test this out later today and report back. Thanks Dave. Mark -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00007.html (10,217 bytes)
- 15. [TRLog] Stupid question - good answers (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 21:57:25 -0600
- Thanks to you all for your responses. Here is what I learned: My "Windows 98" DOS Boot Disk certainly doesn't have SMARTDRV nor does SMARTDRV appear anywhere on the computer. Dang. Thanks anyway, Dav
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-11/msg00010.html (7,201 bytes)
- 16. [TRLog] TRLog in the RTTY Sprint (long) (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:11:59 -0500
- Time to dust off the old MM-3. TRlog was originally built to send CW in this way. gradually MM-3 support was phased out! Gotta chuckle. Mark -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submiss
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-10/msg00061.html (8,327 bytes)
- 17. [TRLog] 6.58 (score: 1)
- Author: swca@swbell.net (Mark Beckwith)
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 20:09:08 -0500
- Perhaps they were mixing business with pleasure in Dayton? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
- /archives//html/TRLog/2001-05/msg00051.html (6,678 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu