Mail Archive Search: <+from:swca@ionet.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:swca@ionet.net: 98 ]

Total 98 documents matching your query.

61. [TRLog] OT's 2 cents (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 07:31:31 -0600 (CST); For those who don't remember because this has been going around for quite some time now, we are bantering about the fact that TR at the moment has a basic bug which EVERYONE will encounter from time; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00100.html (11,110 bytes)
62. [TRLog] OT's 'last word' (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 10:25:39 -0600 (CST); Tree, Should I be happy or sad about the mass of comments "OT's 2 cents" has generated? I take it you can tell where *I* am coming from at least, since you and I go back a real long ways. My good nat; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00106.html (7,421 bytes)
63. [TRLog] "OT's Bug" vs. the "Name Feature" (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:20:33 -0600 (CST); Joe, your advanced age is showing. These contests are going on 20 years old. That's practically longer than some of us hot-shot (flash in the pan) reckless young ops have been alive. Now wait, does i; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00129.html (8,956 bytes)
64. [TRLog] "OT's Bug" vs. the "Name Feature" (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 21:40:55 -0600 (CST); Gator - mmmmmmmm that reminds me of an old contesting buddy of mine from west Texas - but he took down his antennas so that others would have a chance in the phone sweepstakes. If you would like to; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00141.html (8,135 bytes)
65. [TRLog] TR Log sales banned from Iraq (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 06:42:01 -0600 (CST); that was $100 *billion*, right? Geez, N5OT oops, wrong reflector -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@conte; /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00143.html (7,529 bytes)
66. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 10:31:44 -0600; hour before TR would start to increase the speed toward the maximum. speed manually. I don't think this is a silly idea at all. I use this technique sometimes, and it sounds like a good idea, but how; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00057.html (8,902 bytes)
67. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 13:21:27 -0600; Specifying it in WPM would be fine with me. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00061.html (8,339 bytes)
68. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Sun, 14 Dec 1997 17:04:35 -0600; If this were available I would certainly like to play with it. It would want to retain the upper and lower limits, though (gosh, or maybe not). It could be called the "intelligent speed" feature. MAr; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00068.html (8,678 bytes)
69. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:52:22 -0600; Now I think that is too many keys! We all differ so...! Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@con; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00111.html (8,134 bytes)
70. [TRLog] Interesting CW Technique (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 16:54:48 -0600; Brilliant as usual, Herr Director. Thanks Tree. Mark, N5OT P.S. Does that say SPPED?? -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00112.html (8,191 bytes)
71. [TRLog] Hmmmmm (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 07:40:59 -0600 (CST); <snip> I think all we can say is that it MAY not be a problem, depending on which contradictions the ARRL is ignoring and which rules they have decided to enforce - which are answers we don't know ye; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00132.html (8,219 bytes)
72. [TRLog] SO-SB TR antenna switching (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Sat, 20 Dec 1997 18:43:18 -0600 (CST); Make that MORE miles ahead. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-trlog@contes; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00147.html (6,721 bytes)
73. [TRLog] Tail end key, How do YOU think it should work? (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 06:16:21 -0600 (CST); <<snip>> I think the tail-end key has worked perfectly since it was introduced in 1990. I haven't tried the latest version so it *might* have a bug I suppose. Somehow I doubt this. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00002.html (7,125 bytes)
74. [TRLog] Tail end key, How do YOU think it should work? (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (swca@ionet.net); Date: Sat, 1 Nov 1997 06:21:28 -0600 (CST); Pray tell us about the 'unique-plus-one' features of the TR-Logging program. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative request; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00003.html (7,077 bytes)
75. [TRLog] real minor "feature" (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 04:48:27 -0600 (CST); You know, I have refrained from saying about this for a really long time (ver 2.x?) but I will certainly chime in from the peanut gallery. It would be nice if the delete key worked like a delete key; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00030.html (7,029 bytes)
76. [TRLog] Radio interface is not working correctly (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 05:23:41 -0600 (CST); All this talk of radio interfacing is making me crosseyed. For what it's worth, I have operated W6EEN in many contests over the years since Tree instituted radio control. W6EEN has two TS-950s and th; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00033.html (7,842 bytes)
77. [TRLog] Notating OFF-ON times (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:17:32 -0600 (CST); Since 1988 I have included a list of my break times on a separate sheet of paper and I have never had a problem. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@c; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00049.html (6,698 bytes)
78. [TRLog] Radio interface is not working correctly (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:21:27 -0600 (CST); ROTFL operation. rigs. He Gil, can you say "JOKE!" ? I must have missed the NO HUMOR rule in the FAQ, sorry. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/trlogfaq.html Submissions: trlog@conte; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00050.html (8,379 bytes)
79. [TRLog] TR in SS (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Tue, 4 Nov 1997 12:24:38 -0600 (CST); (snip) Let me second THIS. I HATE reprogramming my autoCQ every time I want to use it. My comment may be old, however, I'm still satisfied with version 5.6x. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.cont; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00051.html (7,121 bytes)
80. [TRLog] No women here, go back to your homes - Nothing tosee (score: 1): Author: swca@ionet.net (Mark Beckwith); Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 07:26:44 -0600 (CST); list operations and packet are very popular. Personally I cannot imagine what this would be like. Being a Man, however, I could be wrong. Back to the cave, uh, shack. Mark, N5OT -- FAQ on WWW: http:; /archives//html/TRLog/1997-11/msg00105.html (6,991 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]