Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kg2au@stny.rr.com: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Lost call in SS (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:10:59 -0500
This happens to me at least once in SS each year: Finish a QSO and hit enter. Oh no, logged it as U88SF. Now, what was his call? Don't have a clue. Could just delete the QSO, but that wouldn't be fai
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-11/msg00112.html (6,450 bytes)

2. [TRLog] TR Mailing List Users (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:14:50 -0400
Yahoo recently did two surveys of list masters and members in regards to what would be the most acceptable means of charging for the mail list services. TANSTAAFL! Jimmy -- Jimmy Weierich, K2LV, ex K
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00052.html (9,033 bytes)

3. [TRLog] MAC's and TRLog (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 12:56:47 -0400
VirtualPC includes DOS 7.0 - it's like booting directly to DOS under Windoze. In fact, a version is sold with DOS 7.0 only - no Windoze. And TRLog runs just fine, at least the last time I tried it, w
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00062.html (8,806 bytes)

4. [TRLog] SBDVP problem (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 15:39:49 -0400
A new version of SBDVP has been required since, IIRC, TRLog version 6.65. You can down load it here: http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/sbdvp/src/sbdvp103.zip -- Jimmy Weierich, K2LV, ex KG2AU <kg2au@stny.
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00112.html (6,767 bytes)

5. [TRLog] TR 6.64 comments... (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:19:22 -0400
Can't play messages in 6.64 here either. Trips PTT and immediately drops it. Fails with a previously recorded and reloaded message as well as a newly recorded one. Recording is okay, messages recorde
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-04/msg00071.html (8,015 bytes)

6. [TRLog] TR 6.64 comments... (SBDVP) (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:29:03 -0400
More serious, note that I said that it still works in 6.63. I'm sure Ron will have it fixed shortly. Jimmy -- Jimmy Weierich, K2LV, ex KG2AU <kg2au@stny.rr.com> Vestal, NY USA FN12xa
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-04/msg00096.html (8,971 bytes)

7. [TRLog] SBDVP (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 17:53:29 -0400
Kevin, With the release of SBDVP v1.0.2 I would like to take the opportunity to again thank you for providing and continuing to support this software. I have been using it since 1997 Sweepstakes and
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-04/msg00128.html (6,449 bytes)

8. [TRLog] Bandmap Inconsistencies (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 12:48:04 -0500
I've not had the problem of a call not clearing out. At least not if I stop tuning long enough for the frequency shown under the Band/Mode to update to the current rig frequency. I have occasionally
/archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00010.html (10,343 bytes)

9. [TRLog] Bandmap Inconsistencies (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:26:28 -0500
Dos 6.22 here. No Windows at all when using TRLog. Jimmy -- Jimmy Weierich, KG2AU <kg2au@stny.rr.com> Vestal, NY USA FN12xa -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@conte
/archives//html/TRLog/2001-12/msg00012.html (9,512 bytes)

10. [TRLog] 10m Cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 18:43:45 -0500
When using Post (v6.56) to create a Cabrillo file for the 10 meter contest, it asks you to enter your ARRL section. It then places the section in the Cabrillo header area labeled ARRL-SECTION. It als
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-12/msg00134.html (7,347 bytes)

11. [TRLog] 10m Cabrillo (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:13:05 -0500
Incredible service. George responded 14 seconds BEFORE my original post! I will enter my state and edit the header to contain my section as suggested by Alan, W6RCL. I didn't think of ARRL needing th
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-12/msg00137.html (8,672 bytes)

12. [TRLog] No dups in post (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 18:35:08 -0500
Post in version 6.55 does not identify dups in my SS log. Post in version 6.54 finds 4 dups. I do not see any changes in the 6.55 history that would indicate a change to post, however, Post 6.55 is d
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00171.html (7,207 bytes)

13. [TRLog] What happened? (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 22:56:58 -0500
I saw the same thing several times. If I just retyped the call in the callsign field it would do it again. I also found that putting spaces between the components in the exchange field would fix the
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00182.html (9,416 bytes)

14. [TRLog] What happened? (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:41:10 -0500
I certainly agree with what you say, however this is something different. I also try to be careful how I enter the exchange, but in the heat of battle don't always type the right thing In my experien
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00196.html (11,402 bytes)

15. [TRLog] What happened? (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:09:51 -0500
Ok, after playing some more with TR, I understand what's happening, there's a fourth scenario that should have been in my previous message: 4. TR recognizes an apparently valid callsign in the exchan
/archives//html/TRLog/2000-11/msg00202.html (8,846 bytes)

16. [TRLog] Top Ten Devices Band Switch (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 22:14:41 -0400
I am considering purchasing a Top Ten Devices Band Switch for use with Loq-EQF and TRLog. Unfortunately, the two programs use different parallel port pins. Log-EQF uses pins 1,6,7,8 and TRLog uses pi
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-10/msg00033.html (7,356 bytes)

17. [TRLog] Top Ten Devices Band Switch (score: 1)
Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 23:25:59 -0400
Whoops, my mistake, I guess I should have read the Log-EQF manual more carefully. The manual states that the program uses "outputs" 1,6,7,8 for band data and uses "outputs" 2-5 for DVK in "CT compati
/archives//html/TRLog/1999-10/msg00035.html (8,314 bytes)

18. Re: [Trlog] 1B67LAX Bug (score: 1)
Author: Jimmy Weierich <kg2au@stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 22:24:46 -0500
I found a bug. I searched the archives and didn't find it, but I might not have searched thoroughly enough. Here's something that happened to me using 6.75 in SS CW. If I called CQ, then got an answe
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00170.html (8,824 bytes)

19. Re: [Trlog] 1B67LAX Bug (score: 1)
Author: Jimmy Weierich <kg2au@stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 11:29:28 -0500
Well, I, for one, am not perfect. I know that entering spaces will prevent the problem. Even so, last year in SSB SS I was dinged for an incorrect callsign and penalized another QSO for the error. He
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00183.html (10,867 bytes)

20. RE: [Trlog] 1B67LAX Bug (score: 1)
Author: Jimmy Weierich <kg2au@stny.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:25:10 -0500
I guess I haven't made myself clear. I have no complaints about the sweepstakes exchange parser. It is one of the slickest parts of TRLog. Having been a mainframe programmer in a previous life (and y
/archives//html/TRLog/2003-11/msg00186.html (8,825 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu