Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bradj@arkansas.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 14:53:55 -0500
Once again I would like to thank all who responded to my query, both on and off list. I believe the consensus of responses is that TRLog will not run well in the XP environment. I don't think this is
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00000.html (6,267 bytes)

2. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:05:42 -0500
Sorry for the incomplete post... I was able to get the machine booted up using a Win98 boot up disk and got a long warning regarding the hard drive's lack of a FAT or FAT32 structure. The boot up dis
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-08/msg00001.html (6,532 bytes)

3. [TRLog] TRLog and Windows XP (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 12:25:54 -0500
I tried TRLog with my new Windows XP machine for the first time yesterday and ran into a few problems... I was unable to increase the size of the TRLog window by any normal means. The TRLog window wo
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00091.html (8,574 bytes)

4. [TRLog] TRLog and Windows XP (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:36:23 -0500
Robert, et al: Wow.... ALT-ENTER....truly a simple solution...and the clock seems to run normally when the TRLog window goes to full screen upon using that command. I don't see that command in the AL
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00100.html (7,424 bytes)

5. [TRLog] TRLog and Windows XP (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 12:13:58 -0500
I'm getting an education today....having virtually no experience with DOS programs, I was clueless about the ALT-ENTER command. I know now that it isn't a TRLog command, but a Windows command...bet t
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00104.html (7,349 bytes)

6. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:46:28 -0500
I have recovered from my embarrassment re the "ALT-ENTER" episode, and now I have another issue which I hope you guys can help me with. I'm actually ahead this time, trying to make sure that everythi
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00118.html (8,566 bytes)

7. [TRLog] parallel port address problem (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 23:21:39 -0500
Well, the preliminary results are in and once again it looks like Windows XP has reared its ugly head with regards to TRLog. I hate XP. The emerging consensus is that running TRLog on an XP machine i
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00119.html (6,986 bytes)

8. [TRLog] TRLog vs XP...Direct I/O the answer? (score: 1)
Author: bradj@arkansas.net (Brad Johnson)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 03:01:43 -0500
While searching archives for insight into the TRLog / XP port address problems, I came accross a posting by Tree discussing the Direct I/O software as a possible solution. Has anyone tried the softwa
/archives//html/TRLog/2002-07/msg00123.html (6,480 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu