- 1. [TRLog] Use of "?" in the Callsign Window (score: 1)
- Author: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ@aol.com)
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 16:24:26 EST
- Occasionally when I have the good fortune to be in run mode, I pick out a call which I have shred of doubt about....let's say, WB6ZVC calls me but I'm not certain of his call. My natural reaction is
- /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00002.html (8,265 bytes)
- 2. [TRLog] bandmap questions (score: 1)
- Author: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ@aol.com)
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:59:49 EST
- << Tree, would it be possible to make the timeout period user adjustable? >> I concur with Paul, I felt that the bandmap timed out for me also. Speaking of the bandmap, maybe this came up before, but
- /archives//html/TRLog/1998-02/msg00134.html (7,374 bytes)
- 3. [TRLog] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] "Worked Before" stupidities (score: 1)
- Author: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ)
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:02:05 EST
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_884095327_boundary Content-ID: <0_884095327@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII << I get very excited when someone
- /archives//html/TRLog/1998-01/msg00021.html (11,380 bytes)
- 4. [TRLog] Multi-multi (score: 1)
- Author: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ)
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 22:13:14 EST
- Don't know how many other guys are using TRLog in the multi-multi environment, but we used it at P29AS for the CQ WW SSB contest. No problems to report with it at all, seems to pass QSOs much more qu
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-12/msg00047.html (6,874 bytes)
- 5. TR/Sprint Question (score: 1)
- Author: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1997 08:46:55 -0500 (EST)
- << The switch to S&P aftera frequency change might be useful in many contests too. There could be a threshold to set how many kcs would be ignored before it decides you've left your run frequency, ju
- /archives//html/TRLog/1997-02/msg00036.html (7,689 bytes)
- 6. TR and network (score: 1)
- Author: N6ZZ@aol.com (N6ZZ@aol.com)
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 03:18:24 -0500
- The HS1AZ multi-multi operation did use TR log in a network configuration. We had four stations, four computers. Since we were multi-multi rather than multi-single, we didn't have to contend with the
- /archives//html/TRLog/1996-11/msg00027.html (7,887 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu