- 1. RTTY QRM (was: RE: [SECC] Re:JARTS) (score: 1)
- Author: Matt at HiWAAY.net (Matt Lee, K4AQ)
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:35:54 -0500
- ...or a CW contest every weekend? Wish there were even more, hi. BTW, quite a few (well-known) contesters have tried RTTY contesting lately for the first time and are liking it. That would be ideal
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00102.html (8,574 bytes)
- 2. RTTY QRM (was: RE: [SECC] Re:JARTS) (score: 1)
- Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald)
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:52:34 -0500
- Amazing Matt, you re-invented the wheel....hi. Dan/W4NTI
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00104.html (9,186 bytes)
- 3. RTTY QRM (was: RE: [SECC] Re:JARTS) (score: 1)
- Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:34:21 -0500
- I think the RTTY contests disrupt the bands more than a CW contest, especially on 40 meters becuase people are operating RTTY as low as 7025. I can remember several times during the CW Sprint that th
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00107.html (9,967 bytes)
- 4. RTTY QRM (was: RE: [SECC] Re:JARTS) (score: 1)
- Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net)
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:34:24 -0500
- I think the RTTY contests disrupt the bands more than a CW contest, especially on 40 meters becuase people are operating RTTY as low as 7025. I can remember several times during the CW Sprint that th
- /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00108.html (9,950 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu