Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+improving\s+160\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+improving\s+160\s+results\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:23:12 -0500; I think I have lost my edge over the east coast. Part of this is my fault for sharing things that helped my receiving. :-) It used to be the east coast always won. When Bill Fisher and John first cam; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00017.html (8,419 bytes)
2. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: aldermant at windstream.net (Tommy Alderman); Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:39:17 -0500; Interesting! I am in full agreement with your observation about analog equipment. Recently I posted, in response to Jeff's question about rig's, that I had removed my K3 from my operating position be; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00022.html (11,073 bytes)
3. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 17:40:41 -0500; I'm not positive my K3 is worse than my heavily modified R4C's, it is a really tough call. The only way I would know for sure is to do a blind test on a weak signal. With the Orion I, the difference; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00023.html (8,993 bytes)
4. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: nj8j at benshome.net (Ben Coleman NJ8J); Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 19:25:26 -0500; For some reason I am reminded of an article in 73 way back when, concerning a certain 4-lander running what essentially was a rotatable vertical beam on 80. He loaded up his tower and hung wires size; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00036.html (9,080 bytes)
5. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:00:53 -0500; The operator of that Florida W4 with the 75/80 beam was WA4PXP. He now is in North Carolina. I think the W4, who already had a good contest station, is now a SK. I think what has happened is that the; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00037.html (9,105 bytes)
6. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: jimworth at me.com (Jim Worthington); Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:14:35 -0500; It will be very hard to outscore VY2ZM when Jeff can work Europe at noon local time. This past weekend, VY2ZM finished with twice the scores of K1DG and K8PO (the top 2 US finishers last year). Howev; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00038.html (10,428 bytes)
7. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 10:52:18 -0500; Thanks for the thoughts on this. I'm pretty sure most of the work is I don't think most people consider VY2 as NA when comparing scores. It is virtually in Europe, plus more points for being Canada w; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00040.html (10,345 bytes)
8. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: w8ji at w8ji.com (Tom W8JI); Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 12:41:21 -0500; Right. VY2ZM is so far east and north and in Canada where points are different for USA contacts, so it no longer matters. Non-issue totally. The USA is still close, but here are some statistics to G; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00041.html (7,943 bytes)
9. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: jimworth at me.com (Jim Worthington); Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:17:30 -0500; And, as you said earlier, W1 has more hours of darkness to rack up the 10 pointers from Europe. That's why I think it is great that your station and Peter's (K3ZM in southern Virginia) were able to b; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00042.html (8,925 bytes)
10. [SECC] improving 160 results (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 13:37:44 -0500; Tom, I wouldn't be so tough on yourself. You have a fine station and had some great operators over the years ,that have given you some great results. I have operated 160 from the east coast before an; /archives//html/SECC/2011-02/msg00045.html (6,622 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]