Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+YI9OM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+YI9OM\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] YI9OM (score: 1): Author: Courtney Judd" <k4wi@earthlink.net (Courtney Judd); Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 06:32:13 -0600; Worked YI9OM this past weekend and just now realized that it was IRAQ. Anyone know if this is legit? YA5T called me in the cw test but I think he was a slim. Should one leave these in the log? Or jus; /archives//html/SECC/2002-03/msg00041.html (6,729 bytes)
2. [SECC] YI9OM (score: 1): Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:56:47 -0500; Cort I think they both were legitimate, so leave them in the log. YA5T was active in ARRL CW and several others reported working YI in the phone 'test. (I work a different YI a couple years ago in AR; /archives//html/SECC/2002-03/msg00042.html (7,022 bytes)
3. [SECC] YI9OM (score: 1): Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 09:27:09 -0500; Underscoring Gary's comments, I worked YI9OM in this year's ARRL-DX CW test. 73, Jay/K4OGG; /archives//html/SECC/2002-03/msg00043.html (7,646 bytes)
4. [SECC] YI9OM (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 12:51:57 -0500; This is a common occurance, Leave them in the log. YI9OM is a G and the YA5T operators have been operating with low visibility antennas...its probably a slim. Put a comment about this being a possibl; /archives//html/SECC/2002-03/msg00044.html (7,244 bytes)
5. [SECC] YI9OM (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 16:03:43 -0500; YA5T also called me at W4AN in the CW contest. I think it was on 20 CW on Saturday night. I am nearly 100% suire it was actually YA5T. Quite weak and quite fast. I'd leave him in the log. YI9OM is a; /archives//html/SECC/2002-03/msg00046.html (6,769 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]