Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Winning\s+SS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Winning\s+SS\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: W4OC at aol.com (W4OC at aol.com); Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:14:20 EDT; In SS as in any contest, geographic coverage is the primary issue. If you are running, you want to be on the band with coverage at that time of as much of the US and Canada as possible. 10 and 15 wor; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00001.html (7,412 bytes)
2. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:00:50 -0500; I think all things considered, i.e. location, sunspot cycle, etc....that 40 and 20 will be about it this year. 40 should really' be outstanding IF we have room to do CW in. 160 has a major problem wi; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00004.html (8,538 bytes)
3. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:56:02 -0400; My solution is pretty simple. All I have to do is move my front yard into my back yard. When I bought this place I forgot to look UP. So my few trees are all in front of the house, meaning I have to; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00010.html (7,769 bytes)
4. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:59:08 -0500; _________ Since I have two SS CW plaques for winning SE Division QRP, I'll add some comments specifically directed to QRP and low power ops: 1. You need a beam -- the 'classic' 70-foot tower with a; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00016.html (8,791 bytes)
5. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:40:35 -0400; Here's my rate sheet from 1996, roughly the same spot in the solar cycle, when I came in Top Ten low power from W4WA's station: http://www.orbod.net/aa4ga/SS96CWR.HTM 80m was the biggest band, follow; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00021.html (9,651 bytes)
6. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:10:16 -0400; Its tough to win the SS from Georgia. You need to be where you have long, strong openings to W1-3, W8-9, and Northern VA. better locations for winning the SS include W6, W7 (Nevada or washington), W5; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00023.html (8,267 bytes)
7. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:26:08 -0400; I don't think contacts made above 30 mhz count in the SS. 73, John, K4BAI.; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00025.html (7,062 bytes)
8. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: na4bw at bellsouth.net (brian wilcox); Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 21:49:51 -0400; These statements are based on a full on - 24 hour effort. Your mileage may vary. My strategy the last couple of years running SSB @ K4SSU has been to run well into the morning hours. My goal is have; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00027.html (8,645 bytes)
9. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:10:03 -0400; Did you put any current baluns on those antennas? They can help limit feedline radiation. Just remember the most important dimension for a horizontal antenna is the height above ground in wavelengths; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00032.html (7,912 bytes)
10. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 21:37:59 -0400; This is interesting. I wonder if anyone has a theory as to why this might be. I've had a little different experience, doing a semi-serious operation in SS Phone, Low Power. Around 2-3 am, the rate wi; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00033.html (8,064 bytes)
11. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: na4bw at bellsouth.net (brian wilcox); Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:33:00 -0400; For K4SSU we do have very good success on 80m and actually had more q's there last year than any other band. I think a lot of it is simply the fact that while it may be 3am here it's midnight out Wes; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00034.html (9,459 bytes)
12. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:40:02 -0500; Here is a quick and incomplete compilation of my own 40 years of SS contesting and reading the competitions' reflectors: 1. Forget 160. 2. Forget 10 at this part of the sunspot cycle. 3. Forget 15 if; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00205.html (8,455 bytes)
13. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney III); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 23:16:08 -0400; Be sure to take a full 30 minutes off. Better still take 31 minutes off to be sure. Remember that the way of counting now is different than it used to be. If your last QSO before a break is at 0030Z; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00206.html (9,804 bytes)
14. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: k5zm at comcast.net (K5ZM); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:58:44 -0700; I'd like to do SS this year. From somewhere. :) My interest was piqued by your comment about Sunday being good training for SO2R. This is something I've yet to try as none of my host stations over th; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00207.html (6,985 bytes)
15. [SECC] Winning SS (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:28:34 -0400; Since you can only work stations ONCE, 160m is a waste of time. It's easier and faster to work folks on 80m or higher. 10m can often surprise. If it opens, there could be a lot of activity. An occasi; /archives//html/SECC/2006-09/msg00208.html (10,730 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]