Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+What\s+is\s+the\s+ARRL\s+doing\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+What\s+is\s+the\s+ARRL\s+doing\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] What is the ARRL doing? (score: 1): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:25:21 -0400; As a rather long-time Life Member of the ARRL, I normally try not get publically involved in 'rumors' of what the ARRL is doing or trying to do. But if this pdf publication by the FCC is correct, and; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00092.html (7,638 bytes)
2. [SECC] What is the ARRL doing? (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:47:51 -0400; I'm a 30+ year LM of the ARRL myself, and have basically stopped complaining and making my opinion known to both my director and K1ZZ. Not good for the blood pressure. I don't know how private the me; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00094.html (7,840 bytes)
3. [SECC] What is the ARRL doing? (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:23:23 -0500; The word I hear on this subject is they are basically trying to save their proposal of the Amateur WINLINK EMAIL SYSTEM. They have obviously gone the way of Washington DC and OWE SOMEBODY BIG TIME. O; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00122.html (9,509 bytes)
4. [SECC] What is the ARRL doing? (score: 1): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 03:15:57 +0000; Daniel Jeswald wrote: The word I hear on this subject is they are basically trying to save their proposal of the Amateur WINLINK EMAIL SYSTEM. They have obviously gone the way of Washington DC and OW; /archives//html/SECC/2007-03/msg00124.html (6,861 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]