Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+WRTC\s+Scores\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+WRTC\s+Scores\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] WRTC Scores (score: 1): Author: k2uft@yahoo.com (Dick Bentley); Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 19:25:50 -0700 (PDT); AA4LR wondered out loud how N5TJ/K1TO popped back into first place - part of the answer is in the fine print at the bottom of the final results panel: "Some softwares used by teams did not count mult; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00060.html (7,205 bytes)
2. [SECC] WRTC Scores (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:13:49 -0400; Huh. As I read the rules, didn't the teams have to all use the same software? (I think there were two approved programs) Or better yet, what are N5TJ/K1TO doing to remain on top? What do they do that; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00063.html (7,615 bytes)
3. [SECC] WRTC Scores (score: 1): Author: Kt4zb@aol.com (Kt4zb@aol.com); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:34:22 EDT; Congratulations to Bill and John on their performance in the WRTC! I was pleased to note that I worked OJ3D, their call, and gave them some points. Dismayed to see that out of the nine calls I worked; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00064.html (6,792 bytes)
4. [SECC] WRTC Scores (score: 1): Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN); Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 09:30:16 -0400 (EDT); They are very very good. The rest of us are about as good as the results indicate. However, this doesn't mean that RA3AUU could come to the US and beat me in the CW Sprint or even SS CW. He is just; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00065.html (6,939 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]