Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Use\s+of\s+packet\s+during\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Use\s+of\s+packet\s+during\s+contest\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Use of packet during contest (score: 1): Author: w4svo at embarqmail.com (MARK LUHRMAN); Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 23:22:32 -0400 (EDT); This is for all to read. I have noticed that certain individuals are claiming single op status during contests and they always seem to have one of the highest multiplier counts. I am a pretty good op; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00009.html (7,347 bytes)
2. [SECC] Use of packet during contest (score: 1): Author: w4dd at arrl.net (Jeff W4DD); Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 11:33:36 -0400; Amen, I've noticed single ops in packet pile-ups within seconds after the spot goes out. In addition, I view using packet as a single op as ethical as running more power than allowed in one's power c; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00033.html (8,031 bytes)
3. [SECC] Use of packet during contest (score: 1): Author: wi4r at comcast.net (James Lee Weaver); Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 12:22:51 -0400; I previously responded to Mark's email but I thought Jeff's email deserved a response as well. As an educator I have always been fond of analogies that students can easily relate to. I know not to en; /archives//html/SECC/2008-05/msg00035.html (7,289 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]