Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+US\/VE\s+Hams\:\s+QST\s+\-\s+Do\s+we\s+have\s+a\s+say\s+in\s+it\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+US\/VE\s+Hams\:\s+QST\s+\-\s+Do\s+we\s+have\s+a\s+say\s+in\s+it\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] US/VE Hams: QST - Do we have a say in it? (score: 1): Author: nf4a@knology.net (NF4A); Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:24:00 -0600; Frank and Sandy: First, Frank it was nice to see you at the NWFDX club meeting tonight. Second, I would like to retract my email supporting the elimination of Section News from QST...if was JUST "Sec; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00031.html (12,125 bytes)
2. [SECC] US/VE Hams: QST - Do we have a say in it? (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:36:28 -0500; The League brings this prioposal along each time there is an economic crunch. Especially the section news which is really a pain for the SM (right Sandy?). They will only do this if advertising incre; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00035.html (7,997 bytes)
3. [SECC] US/VE Hams: QST - Do we have a say in it? (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 16:19:28 +0000; I can think of several reasons, but foremost is that the ARRL through the BOD does what it wants to do, rather than relying on what the members want. It says a lot when the ARRL membership is only ab; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00036.html (7,215 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]