Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Stop\s+policemen\s+on\s+160\s+SSB\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Stop\s+policemen\s+on\s+160\s+SSB\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: thompson@mindspring.com (David L. Thompson); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:19:15 -0500; I have received several messages from Dx and USA stations telling me there are policemen running up and down 160 telling the stations they cannot operate SSB below 1843. This has not yet been decided; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00096.html (8,140 bytes)
2. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:47:15 -0500; Dave, I was harassed extensively last night when I made a foray below 1843. I asked if the frequency was in use and then proceeded to operated briefly around 1818. I was QRMed with tuning, comments,; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00098.html (10,004 bytes)
3. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:26:11 -0800 (PST); During the past 25 years I have operated contests on 160 meters this has never been a problem until now. This problem exists because of a small group of amateurs who want to have a prime section of t; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00099.html (11,568 bytes)
4. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:14:27 -0500; I am not a huge supporter of the new 160 band plan, but I think it will be a positive thing in the long run. Activity on 160 has been growing rapidly over the past 5-10 years as more countries have g; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00100.html (9,047 bytes)
5. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: dxcc@dbtech.net (Allan & Bridget); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:05:24 -0600; Thanks Dave.... Just what we were looking for someone in a position of authority to say. STOP THE MODE POLICE...... 1800 to 2000 KHz. BOTH MODES....... Rules that don't exist can NOT be enforced. Fur; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00102.html (8,154 bytes)
6. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:22:33 -0500; I'm glad I'm staying off 160 this weekend, except for a morning sked! SSB contests always seem to bring out the worst in everyone. Since there is such a tendency to point fingers and lump people into; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00103.html (10,453 bytes)
7. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: nf4a@knology.net (NF4A); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 17:37:51 -0600; days, I'm glad I don't have enough room for a 160 antenna ! Charlie NF4A Panama City -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-RE; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00105.html (7,994 bytes)
8. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: wb4sq@yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:05:06 -0800 (PST); And I thought all the jerks were xmitting on TI9M & PW0T calling freq. How many 'CBers' are there on the ham bands??? Gary - WB4SQ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Ya; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00106.html (9,474 bytes)
9. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:58:52 -0500; I'm sure most QRM is innocent, because people just don't know any better or get careless. Virtually all Hams traditionally have been really good natured and don't want to cause problems for others.; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00107.html (9,240 bytes)
10. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 03:44:37 -0600; trouble. We have the 14.313 crowd, the inbred jammers that hang on it. Now the return of K1MAN which is attracting the same inbred fools to 14.275. We have the N4MRF types on 75 meters that run ille; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00109.html (10,689 bytes)
11. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: n4uk@mindspring.com (n4uk@mindspring.com); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:19:57 -0500; You hit the nail right on the head. I love 160m but one thing I hate is someone who controls the opinions of the masses to get the numbers in his favor. This is exactly what w4zv does on "his" reflec; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00111.html (13,128 bytes)
12. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: JDWalkerJr@aol.com (JDWalkerJr@aol.com); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:30:35 EST; --part1_51.1999bfcc.29aa44fb_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Your thoughtful response well represents the hobby that has been my passion and prid; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00112.html (9,232 bytes)
13. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 07:53:33 -0800 (PST); Tom, The only time I have been hassassed by "policeman" is if I have transmitted near the DX window. Other than that I have not be harassed anywhere else. It looks like this year during the CQWW 160; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00115.html (11,973 bytes)
14. [SECC] Stop policemen on 160 SSB (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 13:47:31 -0500; Hi Jeff, A long time ago someone flipped the switch called "good manners" off. Too bad we can not flip it back on. You are confusing jammers with policemen. There is nothing at all wrong with helping; /archives//html/SECC/2002-02/msg00118.html (12,557 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]