- 1. [SECC] SSCW (score: 1)
- Author: james.nail at earthlink.net (James Nail)
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:54:35 -0500
- Sorry for this pitiful display of talent (less) operation. :) I know I'm gonna catch it for this score. C'mon guys let's hear it... I need to get reamed bad so I can remember the taste of the crow fo
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00080.html (6,785 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] SSCW (score: 1)
- Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:03:42 -0500
- Note for next year - SS ain't FD! The activity is lower, and the exchange much longer and more difficult. Not a bad score for 4 hours of effort, Jim. You just needed to put more time in. Breaking 100
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00089.html (6,788 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] SSCW (score: 1)
- Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 13:29:09 -0600
- Putting in 20 hours got me over 100k. And your right, you got to hang in. Dan/W4NTI
- /archives//html/SECC/2005-11/msg00100.html (8,079 bytes)
- 4. [SECC] SSCW (score: 1)
- Author: gabnjb@earthlink.net (Gary Breed)
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 22:31:07 -0500
- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_008E_01C163EE.10912B00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I will be working my li
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-11/msg00025.html (8,647 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu