Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SS\s+Phone\s+2001\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SS\s+Phone\s+2001\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 11:52:33 -0400; John K4BAI.... You were first with 1447 qso's... Next finisher had 199 = q's... Look like you need some competition... I more q's than that = sitting in my car in the driveway.. Didnt submit my log..; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00058.html (7,966 bytes)
2. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:02:49 -0400 (EDT); Macie, It appears that the SS just isn't a contest that our club cares about. For whatever reason. potential. John & I have both made the top-5 USA many times from 2 different stations and I've been; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00059.html (8,100 bytes)
3. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:29:32 -0400; I am looking at club competition for ss.. How is the score calculated ?? We have 1.9 million with 25 entries.. Our hightest score is is 231,520.. It doesn't look like adding up ga, some of tn, al, sc; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00060.html (9,533 bytes)
4. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:31:19 -0400 (EDT); These are SSB + CW numbers. Bill; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00061.html (10,223 bytes)
5. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 09:37:20 -0700 (PDT); I would think SECC would be interested in SS. If I could do a comparision - the SECC is about the size or maybe alittle larger then MRRC. MRRC won the medium class category in 2001 and I can tell you; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00062.html (10,170 bytes)
6. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: jpryor@ARCHES.UGA.EDU (Jay Pryor); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:42:25 -0400; Bill mentioned the IARU (CW) as being one of the fun contests to operate. Anyone who has not tried this contest (phone or CW) is really missing out. Of course this year the WRTC competition will be h; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00063.html (10,077 bytes)
7. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:02:21 -0400; Who was our cheerleader last year for ss.. Did we have a separate leader for ssb and cw ??; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00066.html (7,850 bytes)
8. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:24:04 -0400; My brain is really churning on ss for some reason this afternoon... I wonder what are the best 5 stations in the club for a stateside contest. Not best ops... Dont want to get into ego's.. I dont kno; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00067.html (11,900 bytes)
9. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:36:19 -0400; Maybe we can take a poll to judge the interest... Sounds like we would have a serious chance to win our category with a concentrated effort.. I dont have the cw scores with me... Per my previous mes; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00068.html (9,179 bytes)
10. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: w4atl@arrl.net (Sherman Banks (W4ATL)); Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 19:50:47 -0400; SS is my favorite contest. I have usually been doing it from the Ga. Tech club station. I would be willing to do a single op to submit my score for SECC if the club wants to do a serious run for the; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00069.html (8,459 bytes)
11. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:33:52 -0400; FWIW, I'm planning 24 hours on CW. I'll be in Auburn for the GA/Auburn game so zero points for phone. - Jay/K4OGG; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00071.html (13,419 bytes)
12. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: dxcc@dbtech.net (Allan & Bridget); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:11:58 -0500; I hate to sound like a whiny child but I think this was my first and last "real" SS phone effort... Because of typos on my part with regards to parts of the exchange, two of my multipliers got thrown; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00072.html (8,689 bytes)
13. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:33:34 -0400; I can understand your disappointment but hope you will reconsider. You had one of the highest scores submitted and we could use the points.. I missed 4 or 5 sections... I have had a sweep before but; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00073.html (9,952 bytes)
14. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:38:45 -0400; I like to chase meteors also... I just bought a 31' boom M2 2 meter beam ... now just need a kw... not in the budget right now..; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00074.html (9,759 bytes)
15. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: hamcat@directvinternet.com (K4SB); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:13:50 +0000; I too hope Bridget will reconsider. I like the CW more than the phone, but got zapped also last year. Over 90% of the zaps ( don't even think of asking )were in the number in the call, leading me to; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00075.html (9,240 bytes)
16. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:49:55 -0400 (EDT); Absolutely 100% NOT. This is cheating. 73 Bill; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00076.html (8,382 bytes)
17. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 14:55:53 -0400; My only excuse is lack of ability.. You can find these on the internet but I agree with Bill. Its not fair. Interesting idea.. A little friendly internal competition.. Maybe we could put all the par; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00077.html (9,737 bytes)
18. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 15:00:39 -0400; Well, we all get zapped somewhat, since everything is checked in greater detail. I was looking at my LCR for SS Phone just now. Out of 650 Qs, four were busted calls. Funny, none of them look like ty; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00078.html (11,289 bytes)
19. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: aa4nn@juno.com (Joe L Blackwell); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:05:32 -0400; Sorry for the disagreement, but copying a call and exchange is what contests are all about. 73, Joe, aa4nn; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00079.html (8,395 bytes)
20. [SECC] SS Phone 2001 (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:37:36 -0500; I don't think that would be proper at all. The purpose of the exchange is to make it difficult. Same with the calls. No one said SS was an easy contest. In fact I think it is one of the hardest and s; /archives//html/SECC/2002-06/msg00080.html (10,368 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]