Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SS\s+Antenna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+SS\s+Antenna\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: halken at comcast.net (Hal Kennedy); Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 19:34:34 -0500; Here is an old but good idea for little and medium sized pistols. This is a reprint from a 1980's NCJ, where W3LR discusses boosting the gain of a 40 meter dipole by placing a reflecting wire underne; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00136.html (6,831 bytes)
2. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:52:47 -0400; Am I missing something? This antenna maximizes signal strength out to 500 miles, which for K3LR "includes the high-density Amateur population centers." But those same population centers are more than; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00138.html (7,685 bytes)
3. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:38:41 -0400; And my dipole is so low, I don't need a reflecting wire.... Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at arrl.net Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!" -- Wilbur Wright, 1901; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00139.html (7,123 bytes)
4. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:03:47 -0500; No, you got the message correctly. That optimum angle of 40 to 80 degrees elevation for him becomes 20 to 35 degrees for us. So if you are going to have a reflector, better put it behind the antenna; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00141.html (8,736 bytes)
5. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:14:36 -0500; One other note on the subject: That reflector under the antenna he described is a waste of time. At the angles he is interested in, it adds less than 0.5 dB gain vs a dipole at 40 feet. There are oth; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00142.html (9,923 bytes)
6. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:24:21 +0000; -- I modeled the antenna using EZNEC Pro 4.41 and while it is true that higher radiation angles come into effect, the same thing happens if you just omit the lower wire. May be useful in some high de; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00144.html (7,046 bytes)
7. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 1): Author: lee.hiers at gmail.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:25:42 -0400; I modeled something similar years ago, when I first got ELNEC, and as I recall, the reflector is too close to the ground to cause much effect. If you could raise the antenna up to where the reflector; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00145.html (7,397 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]