Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Revised\s+Single\s+Op\s+Rule\s+for\s+NAQP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Revised\s+Single\s+Op\s+Rule\s+for\s+NAQP\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Revised Single Op Rule for NAQP (score: 1): Author: k4bai at att.net (John T. Laney III); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:38:03 -0500; /archives//html/SECC/2010-12/msg00121.html (6,403 bytes)
2. [SECC] Revised Single Op Rule for NAQP (score: 1): Author: k4bai at att.net (John T. Laney III); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:38:47 -0500; Sorry. This time I won't forget the Paste part of Cut and Paste. 73, John. Although the nature of contesting has been one of technological advances over the years that have increased scoring opportun; /archives//html/SECC/2010-12/msg00122.html (7,372 bytes)
3. [SECC] Revised Single Op Rule for NAQP (score: 1): Author: scottstraw at mindspring.com (scottstraw at mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:03:06 +0000; So to the fledgling contester who uses CWSkimmer as "water wings to wade into the deep end of the pool with the big boys", is this a giant "GO AWAY" sign? Is there a Single Op, Assisted category, or; /archives//html/SECC/2010-12/msg00123.html (7,952 bytes)
4. [SECC] Revised Single Op Rule for NAQP (score: 1): Author: thompson at mindspring.com (David Thompson); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:03:27 -0500; Too bad NAQP changed the rule. I for one still do not see an advanced technology such as CW skimmer the same as outside spots. I feel that if "that" group makes a decision against something it is the; /archives//html/SECC/2010-12/msg00124.html (7,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]