Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Result\s+of\s+Vote\s+on\s+Amendment\s+to\s+By\-Laws\s+to\s+AddTreasurer\s+Office\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Result\s+of\s+Vote\s+on\s+Amendment\s+to\s+By\-Laws\s+to\s+AddTreasurer\s+Office\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Result of Vote on Amendment to By-Laws to AddTreasurer Office (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (K4SB); Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:28:48 -0500; I must admit that I can not understand why someone has to vote "no". At every election of Officers of the Club for at least the last 5 years, the vote has been unanimous. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00204.html (7,694 bytes)
2. [SECC] Result of Vote on Amendment to By-Laws to AddTreasurer Office (score: 1): Author: lee at aa4ga.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:06:24 -0500; I feel the office of treasurer is inconsistent with the original intent of the SECC...as we recently discussed here on the reflector. *To me*, it was important that someone voted no. Notice that the; /archives//html/SECC/2004-10/msg00206.html (7,962 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]