Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+claimed\s+scores\s+by\s+SECC\s+for\s+2003\s+ARRL\s+10M\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+claimed\s+scores\s+by\s+SECC\s+for\s+2003\s+ARRL\s+10M\s+contest\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Re: claimed scores by SECC for 2003 ARRL 10M contest (score: 1): Author: scottstraw at mindspring.com (Scott Straw); Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:33:11 -0500; Gee, it is reassuring to know that the only person who had a score lower than mine, was helping his wife deliver a baby! The other thing to take away from this posting is that if you can't talk with; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00220.html (7,726 bytes)
2. [SECC] Re: claimed scores by SECC for 2003 ARRL 10M contest (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 01:42:00 -0500; On SSB, the TR rate meter hit about 165/hour...during the E- skip opening to the NE on Saturday night. My total operating time CW and SSB was about 3 - 3.5 hours. I don't do anything special...there; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00222.html (8,103 bytes)
3. [SECC] Re: claimed scores by SECC for 2003 ARRL 10M contest (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 12:20:43 -0500; I remember my first contest. It was called the Novice Roundup. It went for TWO WEEKS. And I made 11 contacts. And didn't even get a piece of paper for all that work... hi. 1. You get better as you ke; /archives//html/SECC/2003-12/msg00224.html (8,409 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]