Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+Topband\:\s+Dedicated\s+topband\s+transceiver\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+Topband\:\s+Dedicated\s+topband\s+transceiver\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Re: Topband: Dedicated topband transceiver (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 10:43:33 -0500; With no RF amp, it is possible to get into the -130dB or better range on sensitivity. But the biggest problems are actually poor filtering, poor gain distribution, and simple design errors. Narrow f; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00074.html (8,575 bytes)
2. [SECC] Re: Topband: Dedicated topband transceiver (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (K4SB); Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 16:16:26 +0000; Well, if N4PN still has that old Drake R4A, that might be something to look into. I swear, that thing could hear signals which weren't there. The other thing to consider would be Tom Crosby's HBR. I; /archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00091.html (7,089 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]