Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+Random\s+thoughts\s+about\s+ARRL\s+SS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+Random\s+thoughts\s+about\s+ARRL\s+SS\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:29:29 -0500; Hi Archie: There was talk about closing the Thomasville Federal Courthouse, but Judge Sands, who sits in Albany and is now our Chief Judge for the Middle District was opposed to it, and I think it is; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00111.html (17,868 bytes)
2. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:14:17 -0800 (PST); Hi... Just to add to John's comments... Here are my observations (so far) about operating stateside contests from North GA : So far I have done a couple Sprints, NAQP's and some state QSO parties. My; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00112.html (19,104 bytes)
3. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:45:37 -0600; The problem with 80 cw is the lack of active stations in the SE. I think most folks are cutting their antennas for 75 ssb and forgetting about the cw band. Also the noise is quite intense until you g; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00116.html (21,197 bytes)
4. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: amckay@rabun.net (McKay); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:21:00 -0500; Dan 80 does get rough in the South during summer, but it is clearing up now, at least in the mountains. A problem is that most state ARRL CW traffic nets operate on 80 with two sessions nightly , alo; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00117.html (7,782 bytes)
5. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: K9AY" <k9ay@k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:47:26 -0600; More random thoughts on SS CW from a recent ex-Georgian... Operating QRP, best bands were 20 and 40. 40 was sometimes the #1 producer of QSOs. 80 often matched 15 in QSO production, and was the best; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00118.html (8,293 bytes)
6. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:33:12 -0600; I don't see how a cw traffic net, operating perhaps 5 to 15 minutes, seperated by 3 to 4 hours per session could qrm the band enough to stop other 80 meter activity. If a CW net started up at say 7pm; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00121.html (8,529 bytes)
7. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: mcondon@attglobal.net (Michael Condon); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:36:44 -0400; Dan, How about a description of your inverted L, any radials or counterpoise? What are the dimensions? I have a 70' vertical I have been considering adding a flat top to cover 160/80. I just pulled s; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00122.html (22,139 bytes)
8. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 12:00:11 -0600; Glad too. Nothing special really. Its around 190 feet ( maybe 195). Ive had it up in various configerations. But I find that if you get the vertical up about 50' it seems to talk best. Run the rest o; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00123.html (25,174 bytes)
9. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 10:52:14 -0800 (PST); Michael, Here is what I used for 160 in Ohio : Cut a piece of wire about 130 ft long and get as much of it vertical as you can. If you have the W2FMI book - Building Baluns and UNUN's -look at page 6; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00124.html (17,776 bytes)
10. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: mcondon@attglobal.net (Michael Condon); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:10:44 -0400; Jeff and Dan, Thanks for the info. I will probably haul down the wire and add as much horizontal as I can. I think I can get another 70 feet or so. The match method I can do, I do have the W2FMI book; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00125.html (18,673 bytes)
11. [SECC] Re: Random thoughts about ARRL SS (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 16:22:35 -0600; Oh I forgot to mention I also have the shield of the coax and the return ground wire connected to a 8' copper ground rod at the feedpoint. Dan/W4NTI about fine. think the parties. 20 a there as the t; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00126.html (27,733 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]