Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+CQ\s+160\s+CW\s+at\s+W8JI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+\[SEDXC\]\s+CQ\s+160\s+CW\s+at\s+W8JI\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Re: [SEDXC] CQ 160 CW at W8JI (score: 1): Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed); Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:41:16 -0500; It's always interesting to see who gets what and misses something else... With 10 more total countries, W8JI got these that I missed: GI, OE, YL, EU, ZL, LA, OY, SV, EA9, PY, LX and ZS. Not on the li; /archives//html/SECC/2001-02/msg00007.html (7,793 bytes)
2. [SECC] Re: [SEDXC] CQ 160 CW at W8JI (score: 1): Author: k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed Sleight); Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:13:31 +0000; Thought I might mention something one of the guys told me. W8JI claims his best receiving antenna is a vertical about 30-40 feet high with elevated radials running out 3-400 feet...sounds strange. 73; /archives//html/SECC/2001-02/msg00009.html (7,167 bytes)
3. [SECC] Re: [SEDXC] CQ 160 CW at W8JI (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:05:26 -0500; My mistake. We did work NP4A. We did not work a T9. I heard other Europeans working T9, but couldn't hear the T9 stations. Was very surprised not to work MU2K, but never heard him. 73, John. -- SECC; /archives//html/SECC/2001-02/msg00012.html (8,584 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]