Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WHAT\'S\s+THE\s+BIG\s+RUSH\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Re\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+WHAT\'S\s+THE\s+BIG\s+RUSH\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE BIG RUSH? (score: 1): Author: k4no@mchsi.com (greg and leann richard); Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 12:19:57 -0500; Bill brings up an interesting point. I'd be interested in finding out what other folks in the SECC look at in terms of contest results and what changes it causes you to make in your station, your ant; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00176.html (7,800 bytes)
2. [SECC] Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE BIG RUSH? (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI); Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 12:50:25 -0500; I look at all the BIG SCORE stations and realize I don't have a prayer in H of even coming close to being a real contester. But it is my world and I'm allowed to belive what I want...hi. Really...wha; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00177.html (9,098 bytes)
3. [SECC] Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE BIG RUSH? (score: 1): Author: wb4sq@yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 19:17:30 -0700 (PDT); In my bent perspective, the REAL contest is between what you did this year compared to last year. But then if the bands are acting up you can throw that theory down the flusher. Gary - WB4SQ http://l; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00178.html (10,295 bytes)
4. [SECC] Re: [CQ-Contest] WHAT'S THE BIG RUSH? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 09:35:18 -0400; OK, I'll give. As a little gun, one thing I pay close attention to are the band breakdowns. You have to be aware of where stations are, because the band breakdown for SS in CA is going to be very dif; /archives//html/SECC/2002-07/msg00180.html (8,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]