Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Old\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Old\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Old? (score: 1): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 10:28:04 -0500; Since the recent thread about 'old' (er) hams, I was curious about what happened in the recent SS. Mainly becaues I recalled a heck of a lot of check numbers being in the 50's. So, out of 849 QSO's i; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00183.html (6,750 bytes)
2. [SECC] Old? (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:09:18 -0500; Interesting. It tells me that real hams do it with CW. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2004-11/msg00185.html (7,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]