Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NAQP\s+\-\s+W4BQF\s+disqualified\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NAQP\s+\-\s+W4BQF\s+disqualified\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] NAQP - W4BQF disqualified (score: 1): Author: aldermant at alltel.net (Tommy); Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:07:40 -0500; I had to disqualify myself from the NAQP. Only when submitting my score did I realize that the NAQP had a 100w max power limit and I was running somewhere around 800w!. So WA7BNM will use my log as a; /archives//html/SECC/2007-01/msg00054.html (6,411 bytes)
2. [SECC] NAQP - W4BQF disqualified (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:20:50 -0600; Tommy, That's what a call a real contester. Wish everyone had your attitude. Dan/W4NTI; /archives//html/SECC/2007-01/msg00055.html (7,143 bytes)
3. [SECC] NAQP - W4BQF disqualified (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:21:16 -0500; I guess someone overlooked the fine print.... I've heard of others running power in the NAQP, but submitting checklogs, or not submitting logs at all. OK by me, although half the fun of the NAQP is t; /archives//html/SECC/2007-01/msg00064.html (6,877 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]