Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NAQP\.\.\.40\s+Meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+NAQP\.\.\.40\s+Meters\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:40:14 -0500; After sweepstakes and naqp I am convinced my weak area is 40 meters. I will be putting up another 40 dipole soon. My current one is at 30 '.. My question is what time did you go to 40 meters the firs; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00082.html (7,235 bytes)
2. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:51:14 -0500; P.S. What was your best hour on 40 ?? First 40M QSO was 22:46Z. - Jay; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00084.html (7,911 bytes)
3. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: jpryor at uga.edu (Jay Pryor); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:12:05 -0500; See below: HOUR 160CW 80CW 40CW 20CW 15CW 10CW TOTAL ACCUM -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18 0 0 0 0 9 57 66 66 19 0 0 0 0 61 8 69 135 20 0 0 0 28 40 5 73 208 21 0 0 0 64 9 0 73 281 22 0 0 20 11 0 0 31 3; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00087.html (9,566 bytes)
4. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:54:16 -0500; Depending on conditions, Matt, your "inclination" may be the better practice, because the louder stations have the most callers and it takes longer for the QRP station to get through. If a station is; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00089.html (7,317 bytes)
5. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: k4bai at worldnet.att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:59:08 -0500; My plan in NAQP is usually: Be on 10 meters on the hour until it closes, be on 15 meters on the half hour until it closes, go to 20 between every trip to 10 and 15 when the rate begins to drop on the; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00090.html (7,567 bytes)
6. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:05:01 -0500; -- I have mentioned this before, but at a height of 30 feet, radiation will be almost 90 degrees in all directions. In effect, "40 lengthening out" simply will not occur. There are 2 solutions for th; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00091.html (8,400 bytes)
7. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: ku8e at bellsouth.net (ku8e@bellsouth.net); Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:07:03 -0500; Gordon, Condx on 40 meters were much different in this NAQP then the past couple years. From what I heard 40 started going long around 5 pm. In the past it stayed short during the night time hours. I; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00092.html (8,460 bytes)
8. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:54:43 -0500; A higher dipole would be more effective. Particularly one oriented E-W, so the broadside lobe is N-S. (Remember the W4AN rule on domestic contests: if you aren't working 8 & 9 land, you are on the wr; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00118.html (8,720 bytes)
9. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:03:57 -0500; I had my best rate on 15M... Gary - WB4SQ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00119.html (10,062 bytes)
10. [SECC] NAQP...40 Meters (score: 1): Author: GMacie at innotrac.com (Macie, Gordon); Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:01:45 -0500; I was surprised to see some pretty good numbers on 15. I was on 15 but may have not stayed long enough. I was thinking there was probably more action on 20.. Gordon N4LR I had my best rate on 15M...; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00122.html (10,675 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]