Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Multi\s+mistakes\?\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: k4no@home.com (greg and leann richard)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:11:56 -0600
Ken, Let's get some discussion started here.. What Multi op mistakes did you make? What about the guys at W4AN? ( I guess if you WIN the contest, you made less mistakes than the other folks...) Maybe
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00106.html (7,772 bytes)

2. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:23:19 -0500 (EST)
I had the 4-square stuck NE the entire contest and didn't realize it until Sunday when I was closing up the station. Was wondering why we weren't doing better on 80 in W7. :) John & Jay asked just a
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00109.html (7,997 bytes)

3. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 18:09:00 -0500
Before the contest, Bill suggested that we start the requesting for QSYs for QSOs even at the beginning and even when it was not for a mult and even when there were stations waiting. So, I did it. I
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00110.html (10,516 bytes)

4. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:18:55 -0500
Hey, a couple of times, that was probably me who didn't understand it at first. Actually, I told Bill beforehand to move me for the Q, and whoever was operating on 15m moved me to 20m, and on 40m to
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00111.html (8,242 bytes)

5. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: jpryor@arches.uga.edu (Jay Pryor)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:51:56 -0500
I think it might be helpful for the SECC folks who are not in the M/2 mode to know how Bill has his station set up for that type of operation. He has three radios. Bill and John operated separate rad
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00115.html (15,339 bytes)

6. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: aa4lr@arrl.net (Bill Coleman)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:03:41 -0500
I believe this is easy to explain. People just can't copy CW. I know I can't. Sure, I can copy a callsign, name and a state or province - if I'm lucky. You send me a "QSY" and I'm hearing "QSL", then
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00116.html (9,353 bytes)

7. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 08:32:54 -0800 (PST)
I usually QRS when I ask someone to QSY and seems to work for me. But there are some guys who are not as serious in the contest who don't want to bother... Jeff KU8E (K8MK last weekend) _____________
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00117.html (11,093 bytes)

8. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:39:10 -0500
Yes, Bill. I sent stations to Jay beginning the first minute of the contest. Bill sent them for new mults. 73, John. -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com A
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00118.html (6,844 bytes)

9. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: gmacie@xmmcorp.com (Macie, Gordon)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:49:48 -0500
This sounds very familiar. At least I'm not the only one. Thanks !!!! It's best not to know anyone cause they might say hello or ask what your score is ! <g>. I skip over them also. They obviously l
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00145.html (8,128 bytes)

10. [SECC] Multi mistakes?? (score: 1)
Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (Dan/W4NTI)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 13:10:25 -0600
Normally I will slow down if answered slower than my CQ. I also do this in a normal QSO mode. Dan/W4NTI -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00147.html (9,095 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu