Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Models\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Models\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Models (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (k4sb@bellsouth.net); Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:33:05 +0000; -- Dan earlier sent me the above, so perhaps the info would be useful to Jeff and the others. As to his "not a perfect setup", that is the understatement of the year. When fed as he describes, radia; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00136.html (8,624 bytes)
2. [SECC] Models (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (Jerry Montgomery); Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 23:27:38 -0500; Your apex-up 40 meter triangle data doesn't sound correct. Thats a vertically polarized antenna, and something as simple as this should not have that much gain. So I also modeled it. I got a 7 MHz re; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00137.html (10,090 bytes)
3. [SECC] Models (score: 1): Author: k4sb at bellsouth.net (k4sb@bellsouth.net); Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:13:02 +0000; -- Unless I made a typing error, I did NOT specify the gain in db. It was in dbi. Check your settings in EZNEC. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00138.html (7,015 bytes)
4. [SECC] Models (score: 1): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:34:26 -0500; The gain figures I quoted are in dBi also. I said dB without thinking. It makes no sense to uses anything else but dBi. DB has no meaning unless a reference is quoted. Now it is your turn to check yo; /archives//html/SECC/2005-10/msg00139.html (8,009 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]