- 1. [SECC] K9AY NAQP CW (score: 1)
- Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY)
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:52:02 -0600
- 10,998 points for Team SMC #7 Band QSO/Mult 160: 82 / 33 80: 0 / 0 40: 27 / 23 20: 20 / 16 15: 12 / 6 10: 0 / 0 Total: 141 / 78 I manged just over 2-1/5 hours. About 1830z, I finished fixing the 160M
- /archives//html/SECC/2008-01/msg00058.html (6,892 bytes)
- 2. [SECC] K9AY NAQP CW (score: 1)
- Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed)
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:00:58 -0500
- Well, I got the 40M beam finished and re-installed along with the X9. I only cranked up the tower a little, with the X9 at at 40ft. and the new 40M at 48 ft. Worked fine for a domestic contest. No 80
- /archives//html/SECC/2001-01/msg00055.html (6,981 bytes)
- 3. [SECC] K9AY NAQP CW (score: 1)
- Author: gary@noblepub.com (Gary Breed)
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 10:03:50 -0400
- K9AY GARY GA Band QSOs Mults -- -- -- 160 45 23 80 73 29 40 191 44 20 132 41 15 78 32 10 23 11 -- -- -- 542 x 180 = 97,560 pts I think AA4LR and WE9V were my only 6-band stations. QSO #1 was VP5Y on
- /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00024.html (6,990 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu