Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Ham\s+wins\s+law\s+suit\s+against\s+insurance\s+company\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Ham\s+wins\s+law\s+suit\s+against\s+insurance\s+company\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Ham wins law suit against insurance company (score: 1): Author: nq4i at contesting.com (Rick Dougherty NQ4I); Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 07:28:23 -0400; Message Bob wins! Bob wins! Read all about it... Usually I only make occasional administrative postings about the use of the list, BUT NOW... I represented a client whose crank-up tower was damaged i; /archives//html/SECC/2006-04/msg00018.html (8,193 bytes)
2. [SECC] Ham wins law suit against insurance company (score: 1): Author: k4ea at contesting.com (Neal Sulmeyer); Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 12:20:56 -0400; Message Bob wins! Bob wins! Read all about it... Usually I only make occasional administrative postings about the use of the list, BUT NOW... I represented a client whose crank-up tower was damaged i; /archives//html/SECC/2006-04/msg00019.html (8,919 bytes)
3. [SECC] Ham wins law suit against insurance company (score: 1): Author: k4sb at comcast.net (Ed); Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 20:00:22 +0000; -- These postings are in very bad taste, especially when the details of the suit are given. Someone is looking at a violation of the attorney-client relationship. Please leave this alone. 73 Ed; /archives//html/SECC/2006-04/msg00022.html (6,580 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]