Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+GQP\s+change\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+GQP\s+change\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] GQP change (score: 1): Author: mike40@attglobal.net (Mike Condon); Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:13:04 -0500; Hi, In response to an older note, it was the April 12/13 weekend we had targeted. My overall check, and John/K4BAI input had narrowed it down to a few chances, with the April dates being the most fav; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00061.html (6,372 bytes)
2. [SECC] GQP change (score: 1): Author: ku8e@bellsouth.net (Jeff Clarke); Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:48:54 -0500; Any chance the contest period could be shortened ??? 24 hours , or whatever it is is way to long for the amount of activity we get in this QSO party. I would like to see us go to the 12 hour format l; /archives//html/SECC/2003-01/msg00062.html (7,457 bytes)
3. [SECC] GQP change (score: 1): Author: amckay@rabun.net (McKay); Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:23:58 -0400; It appears the date for the GQP is going to change. One suggestion is for the second week in April. If a change is to be made and if it is to April, we need to act quickly for a couple of reasons. 1-; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00081.html (6,875 bytes)
4. [SECC] GQP change (score: 1): Author: amckay@rabun.net (McKay); Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:57:09 -0400; I agree with a quick up or down vote for the reasons I stated in an earlier e-mail. If we don't quickly get the word out to the magazines and people who put out annual lists, we might have a party an; /archives//html/SECC/2002-10/msg00084.html (6,402 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]