Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+GQP\s+and\s+log\s+formats\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+GQP\s+and\s+log\s+formats\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: w3dya@juno.com (w3dya@juno.com); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 06:18:18 -0500; To: THE GQP "Contest" Committee: Although I've thoroughly enjoyed participating in the GQP the past two years as a mobile, and look forward to next year, I was disappointed at the recent exchange con; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00065.html (9,087 bytes)
2. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (w4nti@mindspring.com); Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 19:05:21 -0500; I have to agree. This emphasis on the new format for computer logs is agrivating. I enjoy contesting, but I'm using the N3EQF log sample. It does fine for me. Now I have to change out to a "cabrillo"; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00066.html (10,748 bytes)
3. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: k4pk@mindspring.com (Don Aldridge); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 04:48:37 -0400; I did not realize there were as many folks as disappointed as I have been on this issue. We had a great time mobileing around the state (16 counties), and will continue to do so in the upcoming years; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00067.html (11,899 bytes)
4. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: w4nti@mindspring.com (w4nti@mindspring.com); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:09:13 -0500; Right....and lets be honest here. We all know one can "fudge" things. Especially during a very active contest. Contesters must be able to trust one another, otherwise what is the point? Dan/W4NTI on; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00073.html (13,207 bytes)
5. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:24:39 -0700 (PDT); --0-1804289383-967220679=:1238 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, I think you need to check logs in some way. If you just send in summary sheets it's like Field Day -- "an operating event; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00075.html (23,670 bytes)
6. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: k4ea@contesting.com (Neal Sulmeyer); Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:41:40 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0015_01C00EBB.BA0A8A20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit With the 'Cabrillo' format, I would; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00076.html (10,932 bytes)
7. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: okh.npi@gte.net (Rich Dailey, KA8OKH); Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 12:21:28 -0400; Or, let's just email the scorekeeper our score. Scorekeeper, I made 511 qso's, with 100 mults. Hey, that *was* easy. I'm 1st place in KY! Hooray!! When do the certificates get mailed out? Scorekeeper; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00081.html (8,300 bytes)
8. [SECC] GQP and log formats (score: 1): Author: k4pk@mindspring.com (Don Aldridge); Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 10:46:09 -0400; Hey Rich, My problem is all our stuff is on paper. Do not have mobile capability with the PC yet, and last year it took about 4 hours to transfer the data to the PC. I did not enjoy that at all. Cabr; /archives//html/SECC/2000-08/msg00083.html (9,547 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]