Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fwd\:\s+\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARLB007\s+ARRL\s+Board\s+AdoptsModified\s+Novice\s+Band\s+Refarming\s+Plan\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] ARLB007 ARRL Board AdoptsModified Novice Band Refarming Plan (score: 1)
Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John Laney)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:16:03 -0500
I disagree. The 25 khz on 75 and the 25 khz on 15 meters that we may potentially lose are almost never used, CW contest weekends or not. If there are two or three stations using those 25 khz., there
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00192.html (8,178 bytes)

2. [SECC] Fwd: [CQ-Contest] ARLB007 ARRL Board AdoptsModified Novice Band Refarming Plan (score: 1)
Author: w4an@CONTESTING.COM (Bill Fisher, W4AN)
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 17:30:54 -0500 (EST)
I like to hang out on 80M CW in the winter. There are times that I can call CQ for 15 minutes with a KW and not get an answer on 3525Khz. I'm absolutely sure if I CQ'd on 3695Khz, I would never get a
/archives//html/SECC/2002-01/msg00193.html (9,137 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu