Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+Your\s+stand\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+Your\s+stand\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: amckay at rabun.net (McKay); Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:44:47 -0500; I asked Sandy and Frank Butler about their position on the new entry level class the ARRL is proposing. Frank has yet to respond. Sandy's response is below. Archie, K4GA; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00251.html (7,747 bytes)
2. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: k4vu at bellsouth.net (Robin Gist); Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 18:32:07 -0500; wow, sandy was really quick with the rubber stamp. funny, he used to be such a nice, anti-establishment kind-of-guy. i emailed hq yesterday, asking for a copy of the actual proprosal. i was told that; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00254.html (9,995 bytes)
3. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: wb4sq at yahoo.com (Gary McConville); Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:06:51 -0500; Robin, It may be an uphill battle but thats how chain letters work... Gary - WB4SQ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://w; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00259.html (11,788 bytes)
4. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 23:07:48 -0500; Robin's quick reply was informative. But let's face it. Unless we replace both of them, the situation is just going to get worse. I have suggested the SECC contact all the contest and dx clubs in the; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00260.html (7,071 bytes)
5. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:41:04 -0500; I'm not convinced that things are going to "get worse". I'm not sure what will happen. After all, people said it was the end of ham radio when they introduced the no-code Tech. Then when all CW tests; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00292.html (8,538 bytes)
6. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:10:45 -0500; -- -- Well, as it happens, I saved the last FCC database which had birthdays in it. I also have some old Buckmaster CDs which I can extract the data from. Will see if I can write a program to compare; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00297.html (7,573 bytes)
7. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: aa4lr at arrl.net (Bill Coleman); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:43:00 -0500; You missed my point: Without a steady influx of new hams, the hobby will eventually die out. Worse, because of the effects of 10-year licenses, the hobby may already be shrinking, we just don't know; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00306.html (7,430 bytes)
8. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 10:36:40 -0500; Bill Coleman wrote: You missed my point: Without a steady influx of new hams, the hobby will eventually die out. Worse, because of the effects of 10-year licenses, the hobby may already be shrinking,; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00307.html (8,358 bytes)
9. [SECC] Fw: Your stand? (score: 1): Author: w4nti at mindspring.com (Daniel Jeswald); Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 20:17:26 -0500; Good, and valid points. However...as long as this country continues along the lines of the 'dumbing down' mentality I see no chance for improvement. The ARRL has not helped me change my opinion latel; /archives//html/SECC/2004-01/msg00309.html (9,388 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]