Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[FCG\]\s+arrl\s+dx\?\s+contest\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Fw\:\s+\[FCG\]\s+arrl\s+dx\?\s+contest\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Fw: [FCG] arrl dx? contest (score: 1): Author: w4svo at att.net (Mark Luhrman); Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:07:04 -0700 (PDT); Hi John, It really raises the Blood Pressure of some of locals to suggest that arrl should be a WW contest. I just think it would be much better participation world wide and in turn more USA would ge; /archives//html/SECC/2011-06/msg00067.html (9,644 bytes)
2. [SECC] Fw: [FCG] arrl dx? contest (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:23:42 -0400; It really raises the Blood Pressure of some of locals to suggest that arrl Wasn't that tried a few years back and was an abysmal failure? ARRL tried to change the ARRLDX into the CQWW by allowing eve; /archives//html/SECC/2011-06/msg00068.html (8,269 bytes)
3. [SECC] Fw: [FCG] arrl dx? contest (score: 1): Author: k4bai at att.net (John Laney); Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:29:32 -0400; Actually, John's statement that ARRL DX has always been W/VE vs the world is not accurate. In the 1970s, I think when I was on the CAC as the fourth district representative, the rules were changed an; /archives//html/SECC/2011-06/msg00069.html (7,611 bytes)
4. [SECC] Fw: [FCG] arrl dx? contest (score: 1): Author: aa4ga at contesting.com (Lee Hiers); Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:12:35 -0400; As far as "leveling the playing field goes": it will never happen. CQ Ooops. Make that WRTC, not WARC! Lee -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.contesting.com/pipermai; /archives//html/SECC/2011-06/msg00071.html (7,678 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]