Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Freestanding\s+towers\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[SECC\]\s+Freestanding\s+towers\?\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [SECC] Freestanding towers?? (score: 1): Author: n4uk at mindspring.com (Ken Ramirez, N4UK); Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 12:04:33 -0500; Well, the good news is that I may be able to put up a PRB1 acceptable 60-70 ft tower at my new QTH in Richmond. NO HOA or CCRs. The only requirement is a 3ft setback from a neighbor's property. I wil; /archives//html/SECC/2003-02/msg00061.html (7,126 bytes)
2. [SECC] Freestanding towers?? (score: 1): Author: k9ay at k9ay.com (K9AY); Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:32:28 -0500; Ken You'll probably get a lot responses from guys on the Force 12 bandwagon, but I have been extremely pleased with my Cushcraft X9. It's probably too big (and longer manufactured), but the more reas; /archives//html/SECC/2003-02/msg00064.html (7,394 bytes)
3. [SECC] Freestanding towers?? (score: 1): Author: k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:56:34 -0500; If you want the best, Heights out of Pensacola is it. I once lowered a 110 foot heights by running a rope from the middle over a tree limb and then to my little tractor. Cut the leg of the tower in l; /archives//html/SECC/2003-02/msg00065.html (7,060 bytes)
4. FW: [SECC] Freestanding towers?? (score: 1): Author: ad4j at arrl.net (Jim Worthington); Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 00:14:38 -0500; I used a Heights self-supporting, aluminum 48 footer for about 8 years and was completely happy with it. In fact, you'll be right between the two places where I used it - Norfolk and Charlottesville,; /archives//html/SECC/2003-02/msg00067.html (7,800 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]